My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00043 (3)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00043 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:43:17 PM
Creation date
2/16/2007 10:06:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/19/2006
Description
CF Section - Finance Subcommittee Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />Non-Reimbursable Application - CWCB Construction Fund <br /> <br />Form Revised June 2006 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. Provide a brief description of your organization below: <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />L .~_ <br /> <br />..,.. u U_...... n__. ___. __.. ---J <br /> <br />)art B. - Description of the Project or Study <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Name of the study or project: <br /> <br />Analysis of recreational and environmental uses, quantification <br />methods, and effects of water rights on water management <br /> <br />2. What is tht:~ purpose of this grant application? Check one. <br /> <br />x Study <br /> <br />Demonstration project. <br /> <br />Rehabilitation or <br />replacement of existing <br /> <br />Other (Please describe) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. General location of the study or demonstration project. (please include county, and approximate distance <br />and direction from the nearest town): <br /> <br />Statewide study <br /> <br />4. Please provide a brief narrative description of the proposed study or demonstration project including <br />purpose, need, and service area. (Attach scope of study, if available) <br /> <br />Colorado has been at the forefront of the western states with regard to water rights for instream <br />flow purposes since 1973 when the General Assembly authorized the CWCB to appropriate <br />instream flow water rights. In addition, Colorado is the only State that allows local <br />governmental entities to obtain water rights associated with in stream structures for recreational <br />purposes in (and on) the water. There has been disagreements over how much water is <br />necessary for these purposes and the economic benefits ofthese water rights. Now after the <br />instream flow statues has been in place for over 30 years, and the RICD statute has been in . <br />place for ov(~r 5 years, it seems wise analyze: l) how these water rights affect water . <br />management: 2) quantification methods: and 3) what are the true historic economic benefits. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.