Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> :J <br />- <br />G) <br />.! <br />I <br />! 3 <br />u <br />III <br />- <br />0 <br />III 2 <br />c <br />~ <br />:i <br /> 1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />August 1 Forecast of 2006 Year-End Colorado River <br />Water Use by the California Agricultural Agencies <br /> <br />'-'_._'_0_0-'---.-'---"-.-.---'-'-.---.-.'-.-'-- <br />-----------------------.--------------.- <br /> <br />3.850 MAF <br />-2003 Target = 3.74 MAF <br />. . . . . . . 2006 Target = 3.64 MAF <br />- . -. - 2009 Target = 3.53 MAF <br />- - - - 2012 Target = 3.47 MAF <br />_______ Year-End Forecast <br />--+-- Use This Year <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />J F M A M J J A SON 0 J <br /> <br />First of Month <br /> <br />Utah Groups Join Nevada Water Rights Filing: Newspapers in Utah are reporting increasing <br />opposition to Las Vegas $2 billion plan to drill wells in the west desert and pipe the water to Las Vegas. <br />Snake Valley ranchers want Las Vegas to stay away from Utah's water and a meeting was recently held <br />in SUalt Lake to talk about the issue. Utah ranchers fear that Las Vegas $2 billion plan means they'll be <br />left dry to blow away with the desert wind. Snake Valley is dry, remote, and straddles the Utah/Nevada <br />line. Most of the ranchers rely on wells and springs for water, and though most of the valley is in Utah, <br />most of the water comes from the mountains in Nevada. Las Vegas plans to build wells and a pipeline <br />and take enough water for 50,000 households from Snake Valley, and additional supplies from <br />neighboring Nevada valleys. Although the wells will be on the Nevada side, Utah ranchers fear that if too <br />much water is removed from the aquifer, it will dry up neighboring lands in Utah. The Southern Nevada <br />Water Authority says the law only allows it to take water that is now unused, and state and federal <br />officials will enforce that law. Officials with Utah's Division of Water Resources say the plan isn't very <br />good and could be improved. They are presently speaking with Nevada officials and it is reported that <br />there could be a deal in the works between the two states. Please recall that Colorado is on record as <br />objecting to those portions of the plan that involve surface waters that are tributary to the Colorado River <br />and subject to the Colorado River Compact and related laws. Colorado has not objected to any plan by <br />Las Vegas that seeks to develop only none tributary groundwater. <br /> <br />Long-Term Colorado River Augmentation Study: The Colorado River long-term water augmentation <br />study being conducted by the Southern Nevada Water Authority has completed the process of gathering <br />information and options for further study. Colorado's comment letter is attached. The study team is <br />compiling the information and developing a plan on how to proceed based on the information provided. <br /> <br />Upper Colorado River Flows Dwindling: High water levels in Dillon and Green Mountain reservoirs <br />helped sustain the booming local summer recreation industry this summer, but there is a downside for <br />Grand County, just to the north, where Colorado River flows have dropped down to levels not seen since <br />. at least the drought summer of 2002. <br /> <br />17 <br />