Laserfiche WebLink
<br />will return to many of their wasteful water use practices within a few years after installation of <br />meters. Average annual water usage within the town service area has varied from 374 to 536 <br />gallons per capita per day (gpcpd). Average water usage per person in the Rocky Mountain area <br />has been found to be :1:200 gpcpd. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, f' <br />i! <br /> <br />l" <br />i' <br />h <br />f: <br /> <br />A decrease in wasteful water use is very important, but an equally compelling reason to install <br />meters and charge according to water usage js to provide a more equitable charging system. It is <br />evident that the period during which an abundant inexpensive supply of water was available is <br />approaching an end. As water becomes a more expensive commodity, charges for its use must <br />become more responsive to varying usage rates in order to accomplish an equitable billing <br />system. As water rates increase, use ,of the flat rate charging system is likely to cause <br />dissatisfaction among water users. The small volume, thrifty water user will become <br />increasingly dissatisfied when he is required to pay high water rates while the large volume, <br />wasteful water user pays the same rates. This dissatisfaction is occasionally expressed by <br />previously thrifty water users becoming very wasteful. <br /> <br />The most equitable method of billing for water under the above described circumstances is to <br />install water meters on each water service and charge according to water used. To encourage <br />water conservation, an inverted block rate schedule should be adopted. The inverted block rate <br />method of charging for water usage assigns a minimum charge up to a specified usage and then <br />assigns higher incremental rates for larger volumes of water used. <br /> <br /> ~ <br /> I <br /> ,. <br /> v, <br /> ~ <br /> ! <br /> t <br />.. r <br /> r <br /> I' <br /> ., <br /> ,i <br /> <br />Table 5 <br />Cost Estimate for Installation of Water Meters <br /> <br />Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price <br />Water Meter wlRemote Readout ea. 800 210.00 168,000 <br />Meter Pit w/cover ea. 800 280.00 224,000 <br />Meter Yoke and fittings ea. 800 95.00 76,000 <br /> Estimated Total Construction Cost $468,000 <br /> Estimated Engineering Fees @ 10% 46,800 <br />. Contingency @ 20% 93,600 <br /> Estimated Project Cost $608,400 <br /> <br />C. Increasing water supply volume <br /> <br />Improvement of Existing Facilities <br /> <br />Increasing the pumping capacity of the Town's existing two well pumping facilities to their full <br />decreed capacities would result in as much as 300 g.p.m. of additional water. As reported in <br />Section II., A. herein, the existing wells each have a present pumping capacity of :1:750 g.p.m. A <br />review of the Town's water rights as included in Section II., C. herein, indicate that both wells <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />.- <br />