Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Table 3 <br />Annual Water Usage <br /> <br />t <br />~. <br />!! <br />r~ <br /> <br /> Water Usage <br />Year Water Usage (MG) (Acre feet/year) <br />1991 241.42 740.9 <br />1992 238.63 732.3 <br />1993 286.59 879.3 <br />1994 342.60 1,051.4 <br />1995 292.59 897.9 <br /> <br />\. <br /> <br />As shown in Table 3, peak annual water usage has been 1,051.4 acre feet. This usage consists of <br />approximately 40% of available water rights owned by the Town. Although available water <br />rights seem to provide adequate room for growth, it should be noted that total water rights are <br />from all sources. If one or more sources are not utilized, large usage from the other sources <br />could result in insufficient available water rights from those sources. For example, if well #2 is <br />run continuously throughout the year total withdrawals would exceed the water right for that <br />well. Although the assistance and advice of a qualified attorney would be required, obtaining an <br />alternate point of diversion from Well No.1 water right to Well No.2 water right would improve <br />water supply flexibility. <br /> <br /> <br />i <br />r <br /> <br />In. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STUDY <br /> <br />A. Analysis Procedures <br /> <br />The method used to determine the adequacy ofthe water distribution system was to analyze the <br />effect of different combinations of pipe sizes and water supply sources in the distribution system <br />until the calculations indicated acceptable water quantity and pressure were available to the entire <br />Town. <br /> <br />The procedure used was to distribute the water usage throughout the distribution system based on <br />the number of water taps in a certain area and then solve for the correct flow in each pipe to <br />satisfy these needs. After the flows were calculated, water pressure during these flow conditions <br />was determined for selected locations throughout Town. <br /> <br />In determining the water pressure, the elevation of each location was considered together with <br />the pressure losses caused by water flowing through the pipes. To simplify calculations, the <br />water usage from a localized area was combined into one withdrawal out of the water system. <br />This method of simplifying calculations is common practice and introduces insignificant error. <br /> <br />The actual calculations were done in accordance with a method know as Hardy-Cross Pipe <br />Network Analysis. The analysis method uses the Hazen-Williams equation for pipe flow. The <br />pipe friction coefficient used in the equation was 120. A digital computer was used to perform <br /> <br />8 <br />