Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I, <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />I, <br />I <br />II <br />I~ <br />II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />I <br />,-I <br />II <br /> <br />in the field, These control markers will allow interested parties to recheck the mapping <br />accuracy. <br /> <br />2. Hydrologic Analysis: The COtps of Engineers performed the original hydrologic <br />investigation for the 1978 floodplain study. The Dolores River has reliable stream flow <br />records, which date back to 1896. The Corps performed a statistical analysis of the <br />annual peak flow data for the computation of the 100- year peak discharge values for the <br />floodplain study, The statistical analysis was performed in accordance with standard <br />guidelines found in Bulletin 17B. A. review of the available annual peak records for the <br />USGS stream station no. 09166500 (see appendix) was conducted, The flow records <br />indicate that from 1977 to the pnsent time, no large flood events or rare discharges <br />occurred on the river. Therefore, it is not expected that the published lOa-year peak flow <br />values for the Dolores River w01l1d increase if a re-analysis is performed using the <br />additional 24 years of flow data fWill the gaging station. The 10- and lOa-year discharge <br />flood values are: <br /> <br /> <br />Peak Discharaes For Dolores River <br />......... i>\< ....... ..? i,... .*grY~#fg?~, ......... <br />. ... ... GrlivelPitNUmber . . /ds .., . <br />3 6,200 <br />2 6,100 <br />1 6,000 <br /> <br />............ ... ~og~Xt;~...~~h")\ <br />..<ds <br />12,800 <br />12,400 <br />12,300 <br /> <br />3. Hydraulic Analysis: The Corp s of Engineers performed the hydraulic analysis using <br />the standard step-backwater HEC-2 program, The HEC-2 program used in the 1977 study <br />is still acceptable in 2001. The CvrCB does acknowledge that there have been a number <br />of updates to the HEC-2 'program over the years, however the basic methodologies, <br />routines, and assumptions developed for the HEC-2 program as used in 1977 are still <br />valid, T.he CWCB would not ex.pect a significant change in the water surface elevations <br />for the floodplain study using the 2001 version of HEC-2 (now HEC-RAS), The flood <br />flow depths in the channel and floodplain areas can be determined from the peak flows <br />and stage table in the Corps repan (see examples in the flood elevation table below) or <br />from the profiles in the Corps or F:EMA Reports. <br /> <br /> <br />Flood Elevations For Dolores River <br /> <br />g~:lrt!:~./l~tI!t;~:r....,................... , <br /> <br />3 7164.4 <br />2 7213.7 <br />1 7274.9 <br /> <br />.. . . . <br /> <br />,l.~(~~~~t~~s.~~................... <br /> <br />7168.4 <br />7215,1 <br />7276.9 <br /> <br />4. 100-year Floodplain Delineati(Jn: The 100- year floodplain delineation was presented <br />on the detailed, large scale topography mapping that was prepared for the 1978 Corps' <br />study, Using the ground elevatiol1S and contour lines on the mapping along with the <br />hydraulic determinations and flood profiles computed from the engineering analyses, the <br /> <br />3 <br />