My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10313
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:12:49 AM
Creation date
2/7/2007 11:10:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Montezuma
Community
Dolores
Stream Name
Dolores River
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Title
Dolores River Field Report
Date
11/1/2001
Prepared For
Dolores
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1\. <br />'1\ <br />II <br />II <br />:If <br />Il <br />~II <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />III <br />II <br /> <br />" , <br /> <br />6. Of most concern is the construction of the 300 ft berm by Four States Aggregates <br />that is designed to have heights of several feet to possibly six feet or more. When <br />there are volumes of water in excess of6,OOO cfs, the river channel will be <br />artificially confined just north of the Akin property.' This unpedes the natural <br />tendency for the river floodw~ters to spread out and dissipfite. <br /> <br />7. The. Four States Aggregates recognizes this problem. To quote from page,s 27D <br />and 27E: <br /> <br />"The construction of vegetated stockpile berms along the pit side <br />closest to the Ijver will also further reduce the ability of the river to <br />change its current channel, which at this point is relatively straight <br />and along the east side of the valley. BeCause of the current <br />channel configuration, there is a greater chance of stream course <br />changes further downstream (such as on the Robinson and Akin <br />properties and beyond) regardless of the Line Camp Pit presence." <br /> <br />8. By confinin'g the channel and preventing floodwaters from spread out in the <br />normal floodplain, greater erosion Qfthe streambed occurs which in this case is <br />just north of the Akin property.. These eroded stream gravels will be dumped in an <br />area where the channel natuIally spreads out. That would be in the braided section <br />on the Akin and Robinson property.. Thus, there is greater flooding and lateral <br />migration of the braided stream channels. Where these new channels would occur <br />is unpredictable, but almost assuredly they would negatively impact the Akin and <br />,Robinson property. <br /> <br />. Conclusion <br /> <br />The proposed berm design of the Line ,Camp gravel pit increases the risk of flooding <br />from a high discharge event on the land of Jack Akin 'and Carol Stepe. This type flood <br />event could threaten human lives and buildings on this property. <br /> <br />, , <br />Additional ,Comments <br /> <br />Obstructing the natural course or channel of waters in the U.S. is contrary to the <br />provisions offederaIlaw (33 U.S.C. Sec. 403). The south bermtbat Four States <br />Aggregates plans to build spans 50 to 60 percent of the width of the Dolores River <br />Valley. During a major discharge eve]~.t that breaches the gravel pits through pit capture, <br />this south berm woUld impede water flow~, The two gaps in the south berm that are <br />designed to drain backup waters in such an event could easily be overwhelmed. Because <br />the berms are composed of soil and gravel fines, the berm could easily be eroded and <br />increase suspended sediment load. This load would ultimately be discharged and <br />deposited in the McPhee Reservoir. In addition, the water flow through the gaps would <br /> <br />Affidavit of Dr. Robert W. Blair, Ph.D. <br /> <br />Page - 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.