My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12472
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC12472
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:24 PM
Creation date
1/29/2007 1:24:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.400.20.B.5
Description
CO River Litigation - State-Div 4 Water Court - Gunnison RICD - Water Court Filing - Expert Reports
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/17/2003
Author
Gary Lacy - PE
Title
Report for the Gunnison River Whitewater Park - Gary Lacy-PE - Incomplete Copy - Gunnison RICD File I of III - 05-17-03
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,", rJ2. 49 U <br />"'"__u <br /> <br />Whitewater Course Design <br /> <br />Whitewater Park design begins with an information gathering phase. In this phase <br />information about the site and the people who will use it are gathered. Necessary site <br />information includes existing gradient, width and depth of the existing riverbed, historical <br />average and peak flows, and existing features in the region of interest. User information <br />includes type and ability levels of the different expected user groups. User groups can include <br />freestyle boaters, slalomists, recreational boaters, rafters and people in inflatab1es among <br />others. Public meetings are held in order to determine the design objectives of the community <br />and the people who will use the park. <br /> <br />The designer then uses thiS" information to design the layout of a particular course and <br />tailor it for a particular commUnity. The layout is typically a balance between the desires of the <br />ma:i:1y user groups, the constraints of the riverbed in which the park is created and the budgeting <br />constraints of the proj ect. Parks with sufficient drop and flow allow for the most dynamic <br />features and are typically the venues that attract the most users and most big events. <br /> <br />Once the layout of the course is established the design of the particular features are <br />tailored to the existing riverbed.' In-stream modifications are difficult and require careful <br />planning. The structures placed in the stream must be stable yet create the desired feature <br />without decreasing the capacity of the existing streambed or hindering the stream's natural <br />sediment transport mechanisms. The structures are also designed to create a navigable streanl <br />at water leyels that vary from typical lows to extreme floods. Within this spectnun of potential <br />water levels the structure must not create a dangerous hydraulic feature. Additionally, flow <br />control needs to be established and maintained throughout the Whitewater Park in order to <br />prevent bank erosion or flow conditions that are hazardous to in-stream navigation. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.