My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12442
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12442
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:20 PM
Creation date
1/26/2007 11:20:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105.H
Description
Water Projects - Navajo - Operation Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/1/2001
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Summer Low Flow Test Report - San Juan River - New Mexico and Utah - 11-01-01
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />GJ1721 <br /> <br />Recreation and Economics <br /> <br />Outcome <br /> <br />The Test showed that short-term effects probably would not <br />be as detrimental to recreation as originally predicted, <br />however, the long-term effects would not necessarily mirror <br />the short-term effects. <br /> <br />Reservoir - Negative impacts to reservoir recreation were not <br />observed during the Test. Colorado and New Mexico State <br />Parks do not anticipate long-term adverse impacts, although <br />there will be moderate impacts due to average reservoir level <br />reductions of approximately 10 feet during the summer <br />months. <br /> <br />Fishing - Wade fishing appeared to increase during the Test. <br />Some outfitters shifted to wade fishing from dory boat use <br />because they would have had to pull their boats over exposed <br />rocks, gravel and sand bars at some points because of the <br />low flow levels. lower water levels kept most dories confined <br />to the Texas Hole. Fishing was good, although anglers were <br />concerned about the loss of fish habitat and food, higher <br />water temperatures, and crowding on the river. During the <br />Test, the fish were concentrated. <br /> <br />Some of the outfitters had cancelled or had not booked trips <br />during the week of the Test because they were concerned <br />with the impacts fishing pressure would add to low flow <br />impacts on the trout fishery. Business owners reported fewer <br />rooms reserved and less restaurant traffic. <br /> <br />Summer Low Flow Test Report - November 2001 <br /> <br />- 15- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.