Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOlG85 <br /> <br />releases can be a major contributor to the entrainment of rock material in the flow. Based on the <br />previous model study findings, it is likely material residing iri the outlet works stilling basin prior <br />to high flows will be flushed out of the basin into the rock trap. However, for the same <br />conditions, additional material may be pulled onto the apron from peripheral areas around the <br />basin. During subsequent operation at intermediate flows (- 3,000 ft3/s), much of the material <br />could move back into the basin. Following the operational testing, a second ROV inspection of <br />the stilling basin, rock trap, and apron should be made to document changes in the quantity and <br />location of material. Some structural modifications may be necessary for higher flows. <br /> <br />Prior to operation of the auxiliary outlet works, the downstream discharge tunnel ,and 4- by 4-foot <br />regulating gate should be inspected for any evidence of cavitation damage, and the conditions <br />should be documented. Ifrepairs are found to be necessary, they should be completed prior to <br />operation. I' <br /> <br />Improved methods of downstream flow measurement should be considered. Discharge curves for <br />various gate and valve openings can be prepared for both the main outlet works and the auxiliary I~ <br />outlet works, based on hydraulic loss computations and available field data. An existing <br />ultrasonic flow measurement device for the 110-inch-diameter pipe should be used to verify the <br />releases through the 72-inch valves. The accuracy of the downstream gauging station for total <br />flow measurements should also be verified. <br /> <br />Following successful completion of the necessary inspections, mechanical repairs, operational <br />testing, and structural modifications (if any are found to be required), it is expected that the <br />current operating restrictions for the outlet works at Navajo Dam would be removed, or relaxed, <br />and the discharge curve drawing (No. 711-D-447) would be revised. <br /> <br />28 <br />