My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12437
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12437
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:19 PM
Creation date
1/25/2007 1:17:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications-Correspondence-Reports
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/2003
Author
High Country Citizens Alliance
Title
Gunnison River Basin - Blueprint for Water Sustainability - High Country Citizens Alliance - 01-01-03
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Finding a Common Trail <br /> <br />Collaborative Efforts in Gunnison Basin <br />Rugged individualists might have settled the West, but it will be cooperative individualists, willing to struggle collaboratively <br />towards solutions, who will help lead the West into its future history The Gunnison River Basin includes an array of people as <br />diverse as its landscape, Residents run the gamut economically and culturally The traits they seem to share are passion for the <br />place they live and a desire to maintain the qualities that make the Gunnison River Basin a special part of the world, As a result, <br />more and more often residents have been working together to reach consensus, Stakeholders have gone beyond rediscovering the <br />wheel at the roundtable; they are getting things done, <br />In the Gunnison River Basin, a handful of sometimes-unlikely alliances have produced impressive results in water issues, <br />attending matters as diverse as humpback chub eggs and the number of selenium parts in a drop of water. Collaborative groups <br />in the Basin are working to develop new policy, and coming up with creative fixes for unwanted results of old policy They are <br />promoting change in some areas and closely monitoring change in others, <br />Participants in the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest Instream Flow Pathfinder Project are developing <br />recommendations for protecting instream flows in the surface waters of the Forest. Members of the Uncompahgre/Gunnison <br />Selenium Task Force have also produced results: significant reductions in levels of the element in local waters, Participants in the <br />Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program work together in a number of ways to try to ensure a future for four <br />species of endangered fish in the Gunnison River. These efforts include finding common ground in planning policy, research <br />methods and habitat improvement and acquisition, <br />Two collaborative groups in the Basin focus their energy on water quality The Upper Gunnison Water Quality Monitoring <br />Group has established a baseline guide for water quality Pooling resources, members have installed water quality monitoring <br />devices to keep a collective eye on changes in the Basin's water. That more stakeholders join the group each year is testament to <br />the power of collective work. <br />The Water Quality Standards Working Group has worked for nearly a decade to take a proactive role in determining state- <br />mandated water quality standards, Members have hammered out differences enough to draft their own water quality designations <br />for recommendations to the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission, <br />Educational efforts throughout the Basin also multiply each year. Ten years ago the Ute Water Conservancy District began <br />organizing its Water Festival with a handful of exhibits, Today, the Festival features contributions from nearly every water-related <br />agency and interest group imaginable, <br />Work being undertaken in the Gunnison River Basin is indicative of a hopeful shift toward cooperative efforts to solve <br />problems throughout the West. The results of collaborative problem solving speak for themselves, proof that broad-based <br />community input and consensus building can be a dynamic and potent tool for planning, <br /> <br />GMUG Instream Flow Pathfinder Project <br />With a slew of branches, a multitude of bureaucratic roots and a trunk full of responsibility for public lands, the United States <br />Forest Service has never been the speediest organization to accept new ideas, After three years of work, culminating in 1,300 pages <br />in six separate volumes, the White River National Forest presented the public with its revised Forest Plan in 1999, Though the <br />plan was long in coming, negative response to the document surfaced immediately US Representative Scott McInnis found the <br />Plan "irreconcilably flawed and in need of a complete overhaul." McInnis gathered Colorado Republicans and demanded that the <br />Forest Service start over, Public response to the draft was equally heated, <br />The Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest (GMUG) hopes to avoid the same pitfalls in its impending Plan <br />Revision, and to avoid the additional workload created when input is presented late in the game, Forest officials created the GMUG <br />Instream Flow Pathfinder Project in 2000 to develop through consensus, recommendations regarding instream flow protection in <br />the Forest's surface waters, The underlying purpose of the Pathfinder group is to help the Forest Service decide what tools it should <br />use to protect aquatic resources, The group plans to "describe instream flow management strategies that balance healthy stream <br />environments and human water needs" to help the Forest Service figure out what is needed to protect aquatic reserves, <br /> <br />42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.