My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12435
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12435
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:16 PM
Creation date
1/24/2007 11:26:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.400.21.D
Description
CO River Litigation - State-Div 4 Water Court - Steamboat RICD - Related News Articles
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/2/2002
Author
Various
Title
Related News Articles 2002-2005 - RE-Steamboat RICD - Case Number 03-CW-86 - 06-02-02 through 10-20-05
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. 'Fhe Steamboat Pilot: The cost of water rights <br /> <br />Page 2 of2 <br /> <br />000238 <br /> <br />attorney yet and said it has water attorneys already under contract. <br /> <br />Councilman Bud Romberg urged the council to get more information on which water rights the city should ask for <br />before hiring a lawyer. <br /> <br />"I think there are other things that need to be done," Romberg said. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to come back with cost estimates by next Tuesday's council meeting. Councilman Steve Ivancie <br />said that will be the time to hire a lawyer. <br /> <br />"I want to be prepared to go forward and not dillydally," Ivancie said. <br /> <br />Before filing a water right, the council must first decide whether it wants a minimum in-stream flow or a recreational <br />in-channel diversion; whether the water right should be limited on five tributaries which enter the Yampa River in or <br />near the city limits; or whether it should be a water right on the body of the Yampa River. <br /> <br />Staff requested direction in the timing and location of the water right filing. Wilson said the city has worked with the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board on its application for water rights. <br /> <br />One of the first steps after filing a water right is appearing before the water board, which will then pass on its <br />recommendation to the water courts. <br /> <br />Wilson said the water board would support a minimum in-stream flow right, where the right would be maintained by <br />the state, and the water board and Division of Wildlife would determine how much water should be adjudicated to <br />ensure that the river's health and wildlife environment is kept intact. <br /> <br />The water board also could support a recreational in-stream channel diversion, which the city would own and be <br />responsible for designating the amount of flow requested. But, Wilson said that claim would have to meet the board's <br />definition of an amount that would be "a reasonable recreational experience." <br /> <br />Kent Ventress, who works with Blue Sky West and is on the committee working on the Yampa River Management <br />Plan, said a minimum in-stream flow right would not be enough to cover the water features in the Yampa River that <br />the city has built over the past few years. He also said data shows that in order to maintain that flow needed for the <br />features, the city also would need to file on a portion of the body of the Yampa, not just the tributaries. <br /> <br />In other business: <br /> <br />n The council unanimously agreed to form a commission to look at the possibility of using growth caps. Forming the <br />commission will be one of the recommended action items in the Steamboat Springs Community Area Plan Update. <br />The council also said elected officials should appoint the commission and it should represent a broad spectrum of <br />opinions. <br /> <br />n Attorney Tony Lettunich announced that a lawsuit by Kay and David Sieverding against the city had been dismissed <br />in Federal Court. The ruling also dismissed claims made against former City Council President Kevin Bennett, several <br />Steamboat law firms, county officials, The Steamboat Pilot & Today, the city's insurance company, the Bar <br />Association, Routt County Judge James Garrecht and employees of the District Attorney's Office. The ruling, filed <br />Tuesday, recommended that the plaintiffs be ordered to pay attorney fees and costs. <br /> <br />"This chain of lawsuits and voluminous pleadings needs to have a wooden stake driven through its heart," Judge O. <br />Edward Schlatter wrote in his decision. <br /> <br />n The council unanimously passed the second reading of an ordinance that would make it legal to openly carry <br />firearms within the city limits, unless otherwise posted. The change in the code would make it legal again to openly <br />carry a firearm on sidewalks, streets and private property within the city. The council had to change its code in order <br />to comply with the new state gun law. <br /> <br />Copyright @ 2002 The Steamboat Pilot, all rights reserved <br />Visit us at http://www.steamboatpilot.com <br /> <br />http://www.steamboatpilot.comlsectionlfrontpage _leadlstorypr/19721 <br /> <br />10/15/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.