Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.; <br /> <br />Narrows Unit <br />Cost allocation <br /> <br /> ,- I' I M&I <br /> I Flood I Hi gh\1ay F&W <br /> ~"'Hem Total Irrigation -I control improvement Recreation enhance'. Water <br /> Capita 1 i zed benefi ts 179,379 30,989 152,774 57,718 241,17 <br /> Alternative cos ts I 3;>7.'i9'i 93 34 <br /> I , <br />m ,Jus t.i fiab 1 e expenditure 526,100 179,379 30,98g. 11,899 152,774 57,718 93,34 <br />i ~,j-, <br /> L - .._'-._...., --.--... <br /> Separab 1 e cos ts 165.3D7 ! 'll Q1Q 1 7A"- 11 , 899 105 832 32 27'i 4,1)11 <br /> I , <br /> Pro.iect costs 6'i 040 7Q1Q 1 . ~~n 10 565 32 990 7 900 4 11 <br /> Interest durinq constructionl . 7.730 I 1 000 1% I 1,334 3.915 765 521 <br /> 1 <br /> Capi ta 1 i zed 0~1&R 92 357 I - - - 68 927 23 610 - <br /> Remai ni ng Justifiable expend. 360 793 170.41)0 7Q.741 - 46.942 25 443 88 70 <br />. Percentage distribution j 47.7 R.1 13.0 7.1 <br /> 100.0 I - 24.1 <br /> , <br /> I I <br /> Joint costs 350.074 I 28.3'i1) 45,510 2!i,855 86,11: <br /> j 1 165 235 - <br /> Pr()j~('"t ('n<::t~ I 3.0.4.760 i 14"\llllfi 711 fill"- - 39,619 21,638 74.97 <br /> , <br /> I I <br /> Interest during construction! 38,963 18,391 3,156 - 5,065 2,766 9,58 <br /> I 1 <br /> Capitalized OM&R 6.351 1 ?99R ~11l - 826 451 1 56 <br /> I - <br />- I i i'- <br /> I I I <br /> I 51 ~ 3R1 <br /> Total allocation i 1711 1~1l "\n ln7 II 899 151,342 57 130 90 75 <br /> I <br /> Project cost 369 800 151,71)'i . 1 71).7."\fi 10,565 72,609 29,538 79 08 <br /> Interest during construction 46 693 19.39] "\ "\~? 1,334 8 980 . 3 531 10 10: <br /> Capitalized OM&R 98.RRR I i>.QQR ~1Ll - 69.753 24.061 1 56: <br /> Annual OM&R ! 3.350.7 L, 10] .6 17 4 - 2.363.5. 815.3 52.' <br /> ..~-.,~, ~-~ ." _. <br />'-' .-..--- .....' .. - - , ~.-.", ......- -'. .--~ - '-'-". < ...--....--..'-' .-. - - - ..-.-, . . ..--.....- _._~........- . ._~...._. ..~-_..~- '-. ..~~ ---...... -_.,,,- <br /> <br />($1000) <br /> <br />3-1/4% Interest <br /> <br />Oct., 1982 prices <br /> <br />'The single purprse alternatives for fish and wildlife, recreation, and flood control would substantially exceed the <br />benefits, therefore, those estimateSCl)'e not prov:\ded. <br />