Laserfiche WebLink
<br />To, the contrary, there are significa~t fluctuations in depletions from <br />year to year, particularly for agriculture and exports, even though the <br />level of development (as measured, for example, by the acres devoted <br />to irrigated agritulture) may be said to be constant over a short period <br />o~ years, For example, during the period from 1971 through 1975, it is <br />" estimated that total Upper Basin consumption for agriculture ranged from <br />~ slightly more than 2 maf per year to a high of 2.39 maf per year, or a <br />~ fluctuation of 15 to 20 percent. Likewise, exports varied by more than <br />:J .200 maf per year for the same period of record (U.S. Department of the <br />Interior.. 1978, pp, 32-36). <br /> <br />The reason for these variations can be explained by the fact that <br />the amount'of water which junior water right holders (see chapter 7 for <br />a brief discussion of each state's water rights system) can divert and <br />consume is a function of the runoff that occurs in each year, Thus, <br />during years of relatively high flows, water rights holders divert water <br />for longer periods of time than in low flow years, and therefore consume <br />more water. ,As a corollary, during years of relatively low runoff, <br />junior water right holders (who, for economic reasons, have not con- <br />structed reservoirs to capture spring runoff) divert must divert less, <br />a~d therefore consume less water. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Instream Uses. In addition to serving as sources of water supply <br />for a variety of consumptive uses, many non-consumptive, instream uses <br />are made of the rivers of the Upper Basin. These include direct contact <br />recreational pursuits (fishing, kayaking, rafting, and tubing), as well <br />as other activities which are enhanced by the presence of a stream (e.g., <br />hiking, picnicking, and camping). Ecological values are also associated <br />with a stream environment, as, for example, in the habitat they provide <br />for non-game species of fish. <br /> <br />With respect to direct contact recreational activities, it is <br />estimated that over 325,000 activity days of use occurred in 1976 on <br />the main stems of the larger rivers in the Upper Basin (Table 3.3)., <br />While data are largely unavailable as to the level of use on smaller <br />tributaries (almost all of which use would be fishing) it is clear that <br />total recreational use in the Upper Basin is substantially greater than <br />the above cited figure, <br /> <br />PRESENT HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS <br /> <br />Given the depletions "hich occur under present (1975-1976) levels <br />of development, as discussed above, and the effect of the numerous <br />reservoirs which have been built in the Upper Basin, the annual amount <br />and monthly distribution of stream flows has been substanti~lly altered <br />from what it naturally would have been, The resulting hydrologic con- <br />ditions can be characterized in two different ways, each of which <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. The active stotage of all reservoirs in the Upper Basin totals 34,5 <br />maf. Of this, the Colorado River Storage Project reservoirs account <br />for 29,7 maf (U,S, Bureau of Reclamation, 1978, p. 24). The purpose of <br />these latter reservoirs is to store water for delivery to the Lower <br />Basin states. <br /> <br />3-9 <br />