My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12393
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12393
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:34:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.900
Description
Bear Creek
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
1/1/1987
Author
USACOE
Title
Bear Creek Clean Lakes Grant Application and correspondence
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-, <br /> <br />between nutrient loading from the basin to inlake phosphorus concentration <br /> <br /> <br />and then a model to describe the relationship between inlake phosphorus and <br /> <br /> <br />chlorophyll a. <br /> <br /> <br />Another significant aspect of the study will be to establish a standard <br /> <br /> <br />for total phosphorus, assuming phosphorus is the limiting nutrient. This <br /> <br /> <br />will be an important part of the study as the reservoir modeling and eval- <br /> <br /> <br />uation of control options will depend on the level of protection required to <br /> <br /> <br />protect the beneficial uses of the reservoir. With the standard recom- <br /> <br /> <br />mended, the modeling effort will be able to identify the "critical load", or <br /> <br /> <br />the total quantity of nutrients that can enter the reservoir on an annual <br /> <br /> <br />basis without exceeding the standard. A task memorandum relating to <br /> <br /> <br />modeling and recommended standard will be prepared. <br /> <br /> <br />A discussion of control alternatives will include a description of each al- <br /> <br /> <br />ternative, its effectiveness in removing pollutants, costs, and a discussion <br /> <br /> <br />of how each can be implemented. The alternatives will include both lake <br /> <br /> <br />restoration measu res and non point control measu res. The most effective <br /> <br /> <br />measures will be recommended th rough this study. Some of the nonpoint <br /> <br /> <br />and lake restoration measures to be considered are: <br /> <br />1. drainage way modification; <br /> <br /> <br />2. detention ponds; <br /> <br /> <br />3. infiltration galleries; <br /> <br /> <br />4. erosion control; <br /> <br /> <br />5. improved flow-through in the reservoir to decrease residence time; <br /> <br /> <br />6. mechanical treatment and return flows to the reservoir; <br /> <br /> <br />7. chemical addition to the lake; <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.