My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12392
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:34:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/13/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #13
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />of some sort. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />minod to be the proportion of the river that is going past Lee's <br /> <br />Ferry annually to the lower statof, it is net necessary that <br /> <br /> <br />storage be provided at th~s time.' The devolopment may take place " <br /> <br /> <br />according te the necessities of tpe caso in oither basin, but we <br /> <br />can prooeed to divido the river as if it Hero controlled and <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />,rhon tho exactions efthe compact are imposod upon oither basin, <br /> <br />control must be had accordingly, so that tho compact can bo lived <br /> <br />up to. <br /> <br />J.'Jl. NORVIEL: You agreo with Mr. Carpentor's idea that tho <br /> <br />greater usoor the .~tor above will havo a tendency to regulato <br /> <br />and ostablish a bettor floH in tho rivor, loss orratic than it <br />I <br /> <br />now is. <br /> <br />HR. CAW1,iBLL: I think that's obvious. <br /> <br />MR. NORVlliL: So that you would have ne objeotion to the <br /> <br />agroement of a minimum; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CALDHELL: If storago ,is prosupposod, I think I just <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />i <br />said what that storago idoa sho~ld bo, and I thinlc it can bo <br /> <br />\forkod out. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: I'think it is obvious that tho vrholo possibil- <br /> <br />ity of division rosts on tho promise of storago, othorwiso it is <br /> <br />quite impossible. <br /> <br />MR. CARPE1ITER: Eithor rosorvoir or land sterago - storago <br /> <br />MR. CALiY,JEl>L: Porsonally: I would not vrish to bind tho uppor <br />states to an agreomont Hhorob:,f thoy aro depondent upon land stor- <br />, <br />I <br />ago. I don't rogard it as un90rtain, but I do rogard it as un- <br />cortain as to vrhon it vrill occur, as to \,rhon the bonefits from <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />it will accruo 80 wo couldn't' compact on that. <br /> <br />~,re must como to <br />13th - S.F. -28 <br />122 <br /> <br />.,~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.