My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12392
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:34:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/13/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #13
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. ',,' <br />that they would be, of necessity', cempelled to construct large <br /> <br />dams and store large quantitie's of water threugho\\t the basin <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />the knowledge that I have and the study I have been able to <br />give it sinco receiving thls pape~,'I do not think that wo' can <br /> <br />afford to agree en a longer period than three :yearste avo rage <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the flow to be turned dO\Tn the rive.. I think,that would be <br /> <br />as long as would give us any safety, that weuld be satisfactery <br /> <br />at all to eur people below,- and I ,think when California studies <br /> <br />this questien 0arefu11y and seriously they 'will como te the, <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />same conclusion; so, I at this time, \~thout further informa- <br /> <br />tion on the subject and more analySis ef the situation in <br /> <br />that river, will oppose anything 1bnger than a three year <br /> <br />poriod of averaging tho flow;' <br /> <br />MR. EI1ERSOH: HO\I about the suggostion of a stipulation <br /> <br />as ,to minimum yearly flew? <br />MR. NORVIEL; That \<Ii11 be pqssib1e, - 1 weu1d be very <br /> <br />glad te include that in it, and when the time cemes to discuss <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />that questien, we will suggest 'it. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. El'iF.RSON: It has a direct bearing upon tho proposition <br /> <br />and is probably Honby of consideration noW'. <br />MR. HOOVER: Looking at it :trom an engineering point <br />,of view, the whole of this proposal consists of watering of the <br />lo\l0r states by flood flo\<1 and using the minim\lm regular flow <br /> <br />in the upper states; <br /> <br />, ' <br />, ' <br />MR. NORVIEL: vie thinlc, not:from what 11ro Carpenter said, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />in Colorado, Utah and NEM Mexico, which \lill control the floods <br /> <br />13th - SiF. <br />18 <br /> <br />112 <br /> <br />112 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.