Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />,MR. CALDHELL; I undorstand, Mr. Carponter' has locatod <br /> <br />a point of division bolow tho Paria. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: Yos. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CALDI,ELL; I think your argumont favored the point of <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />division above tho Paria with separato moasuromont of tho Paria. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL'; No, it may bo below or above or anywhere, <br /> <br /> <br />it is absolutoly ;immaterial to us. <br /> <br />MR. CALDHE:SL; I can't say that it is quite immaterial <br /> <br />to mo. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: Your ,idea is to include tho Paria in the <br /> <br />moasuromont, "Thother made soparately or together? <br /> <br />IIffi. CALDHELL; I think it 'dould bo'moro satisfactory if <br /> <br />HO mako tho measurement separately, measuro the Paria separateJ;y <br /> <br />and put the gauging station abevo the mouth ef tho Paria because <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />that will conserve tho river resources Mr. Norviolspeaks of, <br /> <br />and it has other advantagos. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: Tho thought was the mere gauging of the <br /> <br />stream instead of a gauging station would be adapted to tho <br /> <br />conditions of development an~the line of demarkation was not <br /> <br />intonded to fix absolutoly and ferevor the placo of gauging. <br /> <br />That wou14 bo lnlerever good engineoring dictatod and could be <br /> <br />changed from time to time. It might be changed by natural <br /> <br />orosion or other conditions. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />}ffi. A. P. DAVIS: It occurs to mo, Mr. Chairman, that the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />matter as left in the draft of c,ompact by Hr. Carpenter, leaving <br /> <br />the determination of tho flow to tho Geological Survoy Hithout <br /> <br />13th - S.F. <br />15 <br /> <br />109 <br />