My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12366
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12366
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:34:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum - California
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1940
Author
Metro Water District
Title
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California - Second Annual Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, ~ "1' <br />J..~'::' <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br />METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT <br /> <br />I <br />;1 <br />I <br />l <br /> <br />humps on the chart is a measure of the time taken for the water to <br />travel a known distance. While the principle of the method is direct <br />and simple, there is a great amount of work involved in its accurate <br />application. <br />The results of the tests were gratifying in that all of the pumps <br />exceeded the guarantees by a considerable margin. The highest <br />capacity was shown by the PUIllPS at Gene plant, wit.h an average <br />per PUIllP of 216 cubic feet per second, or more than 93,000 gallons <br />per minute. The pumps at Iron Mountain plant showed the highest <br />efficiency, averaging 91.3 per cent. The average efficiency of all <br />pumps in the five plants is nearly 90.5 per cent, which is an out- <br />standing record in pump performance. <br />The bonus rate for each per cent above the stipulated 88 was <br />$10,000 at Intake and Gene, $5,000 at Iron Mountain, and $15,000 <br />at Eagle Mountain and Hayfield, resulting in payments of $29,000, <br />$29,000, $16,500, $24,000, and $28,500, respectively, a total of $127,- <br />000. <br />Table 16 contains eugineering and cost data pertaining to each <br />plant. The cost is shown as of June 30, 1940, with all work of <br />construction and installation of equipment virtually completed. It <br />does not include cost of housing, which is shown separately for <br />each of the four camps, one camp at Gene serving two plants. <br /> <br />J- \ <br /> <br />POWER SUPPLY <br /> <br />The principal power supply for the Colorado River aqueduct is <br />obtained from Boulder dam under a contract with the United States <br />dated April 26, 1930, and amendments thereto, by which 36 per <br />cent of the firm energy and all of the secondary energy at Boulder <br />dam is allotted to the District. This contract assures a supply of <br />firm power sufficient to pump about 1,000 cubic feet per second, but <br />when the water demand exceeds that amount Boulder power must <br />be supplemented from other sources during periods when sufficient <br />secondary energy is not available. J n this connection power from <br />the Parker power plant among others will be utilized. <br />The District's obligation to pay for its allotment of firm energy <br />started at 55 per cent in July 1938, and will increase to 100 per <br />cent of the allotment after July 1941. It is estimated that the de- <br />mand for water will not reach 1,000 cubic feet per second until <br />1960, or later, and therefore during the next 15 or 20 years a co]]- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.