Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C0' ,', (l 0 <br />\J ,_ LJ ,) <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />(c) 12 -month periods for users concerned with the minimum ex- <br />pected inflow into large reservoirs, <br /> <br />Low-flow frequency for 24- and 48-month periods and its application to stor- <br />age studies will be covered in a later report. <br /> <br />Low-flow frequency data extend and enlarge the opportunities for water- <br />supply studies beyond the opportunities available from flow-duration data <br />such as described in Technical Report No, 1. Low-flow frequency curves <br />can be used to determine storage requirements, to select sites for water <br />supplies, to appraise the adequacy of unregulated natural flow for allocation <br />of water rights and dilution of wastes, and to delineate hydrologic character- <br />istics. <br /> <br />The need for low-flow frequency analyses for streams in Kansas has <br />been long recognized, but the task of arranging the basic streamflow records <br />for such analyses has been a major obstacle, With electronic computers the <br />task has now been simplified, To prepare the data for electronic computers, <br />more than 2,450 station years of daily discharges were transferred to punched <br />tape, which totaled 25 miles in length, The tapes were passed through an <br />electronic computer which prepared a list of the lowest mean discharge for <br />six separate intervals of time ranging from 7 to 183 consecutive days for <br />each year of record at each gaging station, These lists provided the nucle- <br />us for the studies herein, The lists for each gaging station are maintained in <br />the files of the U. S. Geological Survey in Topeka and are available to those <br />who wish to make additional studies. <br /> <br />This report provides water-use planners with low-flow frequency curves <br />for Kansas streams, The curves could have been based solely on the period <br />of operation of each gaging station, but this procedure would result in mis- <br />leading data for small basins that had experienced a preponderance of either <br />floods or droughts not typical of the long term experience in the general re- <br />gion, The future expectance of flow needed for planning purposes would best <br />be defined if records were available over a long-term period at all sites. <br />Such a goal cannot be attained with the records now available, and the task <br />of obtaining natural-flow records in the future will be complicated by man- <br />made regulation, In the absence of long-term records at all sites, typical <br />regional experience has been approached in this report by using correlation <br />techniques to extend the experience of all records to a 37-year base period <br />April 1920 to March 1957 and by applying to each stream the representative <br />hydrologic experience of that region. <br /> <br />As transfer of experience from one stream to another depends on cor- <br />relation of unregulated flow, frequency curves should be developed now be- <br />fore proposed artificial storage and land-use developments seriously modi- <br />fy natural flow, Furthermore, curves for unregulated flow provide a base <br />for future studies of the effect of regulation, diversion, and ground-water <br />withdrawal. <br />