My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12351
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12351
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:43 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:32:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USGS
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/1988
Author
USGS
Title
Estimation of Natural Dissolved Solids Discharge in the Upper Colorado River Basin - Western United States
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />N <br />,...ol. <br />.-.. <br />00 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Separate the annual mass-balance discharge of dissolved solids <br />(computed in step 1) based on the distribution of mean monthly <br />discharge (water years 1914-57) from the model results in step 3. <br />Add the values of monthly dissolved-solids discharge computed in step 4 <br />to the data set. These values represent predevelopment conditions at <br />the site, They are paired with values of mean monthly natural stream- <br />flow from the same period (water years 1914-57). All development <br />variables for these predevelopment "observations" are set to zero. <br />Calibrate the model using the predevelopment and historical data. <br />Adjust the values of monthly predevelopment dissolved-solids discharge <br />based on the mean monthly distribution for water years 1914-57 from the <br />model results in step 6. <br />Recalibrate the model. <br />Compute ~eighting factors using the monthly residual variances. <br />Recalibrate the model using weighted regression. <br />Repeat steps 9 and 10, if necessary, until there are no significant <br />differences among the monthly weighted-residual variances, <br />Adjust the values of monthly predevelopment dissolved-solids discharge <br />based on the' mean monthly distribution of dissolved-solids discharge <br />for water years 1914-57 obtained from the model results in step 10. <br />Recalibrate the weighted-regression model. <br />Compute the monthly coefficients a using equation 21, with time <br />(t) as given by equation 12. m <br />Compute monthly natural dissolved-solids discharge using equation 20, the <br />regression parameters estimated in steps 13 and 14, and monthly values <br />of natural streamflow. <br /> <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />6, <br />7. <br /> <br />8, <br />9. <br />10. <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />13, <br />14. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />ESTIMATION OF NATURAL DISSOLVED-SOLIDS DISCHARGE USING <br />THE STATISTICAL METHOD <br /> <br />The results of applying the outlined statistical method to data from <br />16 selected sites in the Upper Colorado River Basin are reported in tables <br />8 and 9. The coefficient and exponent values used to estimate natural <br />dissolved-solids discharge for each site are listed in table 8. Estimates <br />of monthly mean natural dissolved-solids discharge for each site are listed <br />in table 9. <br /> <br />The development variables that were included in the model for each site <br />and the sign (positive or negative) of the associated regression coefficients <br />are listed in table 10, The R2, standard errors of estimation, and compari- <br />sons between the mean annual (water years 1914-57) natural dissolved-solids <br />discharge estimated by the statistical method and by mass balance also are <br />listed. The development variables expected to indicate an increase in <br />dissolved-solids discharge were: irrigated area, net reservoir releases, <br />consumptive use in preceding months, and total adjustments to streamflow, if <br />the predominant adjustments were reservoir releases, Net diversions, consump- <br />tive use, and total adjustments to streamflow, if predominantly diversions, <br />were expected to indicate a decrease in dissolved-solids discharge, The <br />development variables included in the model for each site generally had the <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.