Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />of the data used in the analysis and much valuable advice and discussion on <br />development of the statistical method. <br /> <br />l\.:> <br />o <br />(::J <br />OJ <br /> <br />DATA AVAILABILITY <br /> <br />At the beginning of this study, available data were reviewed to determine <br />the type of analysis possible for estimating natural dissolved-solids dis- <br />charge for water years 1906-83, which is the period used in operation of the <br />CRSS model, Daily streamflow and periodic water-quality data for part of this <br />period were available from the U.S. Geological Survey's National Water Data <br />Storage and Retrieval System (WATSTORE) (Hutchinson, 1975); monthly streamflow <br />and dissolved-solids discharge previously had been computed from these data <br />(U.S. Department of the Interior, 1985; Liebermann and others, 1987). The <br />periods of record for the monthly values are listed in table 1 for the sites <br />included in this report. <br /> <br />The U.S, Bureau of Reclamation provided estimates of annual irrigated <br />area, monthly consumptive use by agriculture, and monthly natural streamflow <br />from the CRSS data set for each site during 1906-83. The irrigated-area data <br />had been compiled from several sources, including: State Engineer reports, <br />census data, Colorado River Storage Project estimates, State agricultural <br />statistics, Colorado Water Conservation Board reports, and others (U.S. Bureau <br />of Reclamation, written commun., 1978). Because of inconsistencies in compu- <br />tational methods, the irrigated-area data for 1976-83 was disregarded in the <br />analysis for most of the sites. <br /> <br />,''; <br /> <br />Agricultural consumptive use, as defined in the CRSS data set, is the <br />difference between the volume of water diverted for irrigation and the volume <br />of water that eventually returns to the stream, Therefore, consumptive use <br />includes all evaporative losses during conveyance and application, crop <br />transpiration, and phreatophyte transpiration along the canals and return-flow <br />paths. It does not include evapotranspiration of natural precipitation. The <br />monthly consumptive-use data were estimated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation <br />using a modified version of the Blaney-Criddle formula (U.S. Soil Conservation <br />Service, 1970). The areal extent of specific crops was estimated using county <br />census data, <br /> <br />::-~ <br /> <br />""> <br />-~ ' <br /> <br />-.~ <br />q <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />The U.S, Bureau of Reclamation computed natural streamflow as the sum of <br />the historic streamflow and adjustments representing upstream development. <br />Total adjustments included agricultural consumptive use, transbasin diver- <br />sions, reservoir effects, municipal and industrial use, and incidental deple- <br />tions. Monthly import and export data were obtained from the U.S. Geological <br />Survey and irrigation districts. Reservoir effects consisted of evaporation <br />and changes in surface and bank storage. Evaporation for each reservoir was <br />computed by multiplying the monthly average water-surface area by the monthly <br />rate of evaporation. Changes in bank storage were estimated as 10 percent of <br />the change in surface storage. Monthly municipal and industrial use was <br />estimated by u~iformly distributing annual powerplant consumptive use. <br />Incidental depletions accounted for such losses as stock-pond evaporation and <br />fish and wildlife use. For periods when historical streamflow data were <br />unavailable, the natural-flow values were estimated using regression tech- <br />niques (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, written commun., 1983). <br />