My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12345
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12345
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:42 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:32:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP Annual Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/12/1995
Author
UCRBRIP
Title
1994 Annual Reports Package Part 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Numerous samples have been sent to the larval Fish laboratory, CSU for <br />counting and identification. Therefore, the information presented here <br />is preliminary. <br /> <br />Five species of native fish were captured. They were: ~ sp. <br />(n=579), Colorado squawfish (n=345), bluehead sucker (n=134), speckled <br />dace (n=46) and flannelmouth sucker (n=35). Most native fish were <br />captured in August (n=529). JUly (n=2B4) and September (n=241) <br />captures were similar, while the fewest number of natives was found in <br />June (n=94). <br /> <br />Gila sp. were the most numerous natives encountered in every month but <br />September. They were most numerous in August (n=352), then July <br />(n=113), September (n=67) and June (n=47), respectively. Most Gila sp. <br />were captured above Three Fords rapid (RM 156.4). Gila sp. appeared to <br />have left backwater habitats for main channel habitats between the <br />August and September surveys. The apparent substantial growth of fish <br />during the summer may have accounted for this early shift. Mean length <br />of all Gila sp. captured in June was 67.5 rnm, indicating that these <br />were Age 1+ fish. By July, only 3 Age 1+ fish were encountered. Age 0 <br />fish had a mean length of 30.4 mm in July. By September, these same <br />fish exhibited a mean length of 60.B rnm. <br /> <br />Growth patterns for Colorado squawfish mimicked those of Gila sp., but <br />captures differed. More squawfish were captured in September (n=144) <br />than other months. Captures followed, in descending order, the <br />following pattern: July (n=97), August (n=71), June (n=33).. Note <br />should be taken, however, that 69 of the September squawfish captured <br />were caught in 1 seine haul in a backwater at RM 143.6. Most squawfish <br />were encountered below the known spawning site at Three Fords rapid (RM <br />156.4) As with Gila sp., mean length of fish caught in June (67.4 mm) <br />indicated Age 1+ fish were sampled. In July, only 3 Age 1+ fish were <br />encountered and Age 0 fish had attained a mean length of 24.9 mID. Mean <br />length of Age 0 fish had increased to 57.7 mm by September. <br /> <br />Captures of bluehead suckers most closely followed those of Gila sp. <br />Mean lengths increased from 30.0 mm in July to 57.1 mm in September, <br />when the number captured dropped >50%. Flannelmouth suckers were <br />encountered in low and relative stable numbers through the summer. <br />Mean lengths by month indicated Age 1+ fish utilizing backwaters in <br />June, but Age 0 fish in backwaters thereafter. Mean lengths increased <br />from 3B.9 mID in July to 66.2 mID in September. Speckled dace were most <br />numerous in August samples, which accounted for B7% of all captures. <br />Mean length in August was 27.4 mID. This had increased to 38.0 mID by <br />September, but this figure is based on a very low sample size (n=4). <br /> <br />Although analysis of habitat use, habitat features, non-native fish <br />communities, etc. remain, preliminary data indicate there was spawn in <br />both Gila sp. and Colorado squawfish in 1994. In addition, conditions <br />for growth appear to have been excellent with a resultant phenomenal <br />growth rate in native fishes. Some tables illustrating the information <br />discussed here follow. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.