WSP12333 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,~ water on non-riparian land, as for example for a municipal water supply, is regarded as an unreasonable use. Thus in 1905 when New York City sought to obtain water from the Catskill mountain area it had to condemn the riparian rights of all riparians on the source rivers. Legislators from the counties of origin were powerful enough to demand extensive protections before enacting laws permitting the city to acquire water rights. Long after he left office Mr. McClellan, the then Mayor of New York City, recalled in public addresses the concessions he had had to make to permit the city to flood the distant mountain valleys for its vital water supply. Thus the city had to compensate the areas of origin for 'every conceivable claim' that might reasonably arise from such projects. The city paid not only for the value of the property, buildings and equipment taken, but also for all business losses and loss of wages, both to riparians whose property was actually taken, and to non-riparians in nearby areas who were adversely affected by the project. "It will be recalled that this type of indirect damage claim was not provided for in the takeover by Los Angeles of Owens Valley water rights and that this was one of the reasons the Valley residents opposed the project so vigorously.n36 The previous extensive quotation from Johnson omits his discussion of Nebraska basin of origin protection statutes passed as early as 1889. Basically, these statutes had once prohibited all out-of-basin water transfers, then later allowed some transfers from certain size streams and still later permitted certain transfers if the return flows were within the greater basin of the Missouri River (which includes all of Nebraska as well as much of its -28-