My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12333
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12333
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:39 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:31:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8410.300.60
Description
Basin Multistate Organizations - Missouri Basin States Association - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
1/27/1983
Author
MBSA
Title
An Issue Analysis of Out-Of-Basin Water Transfer
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br />western states for the protection of such areas, probably to fill the hiatus <br /> <br />in the common law. In the east New York in 1905 enacted an important <br /> <br />statute concerning areas of origin. <br /> <br />California <br />. <br /> <br />"Among the western states California has demonstrated more concern for <br /> <br />area-of-origin protection than any other. The origin of this concern can, in <br /> <br />large measure, be traced to the Owens Valley experience. A drought <br /> <br />beginning in 1895 and continuing for nearly 10 years brought a serious water <br /> <br />crisis to the Los Angeles region of the state. The City had to find <br /> <br />additional water. . Imaginative engineers looked about and settled on the <br /> <br />Owens River, then running through the prosperous farming community of <br /> <br />Owens Valley, on the east side of the Sierra Mountains, as the most <br /> <br />available alternate source. An aggressive campaign to buy water rights in <br /> <br />the Valley was initiated. Bonds to finance the project were voted in 1905. <br /> <br />Intense opposition developed from Valley residents, many of whom believed <br /> <br />that the sale of water rights to Los Angeles would destroy the entire valley <br /> <br />economy. Many residents who did not have water rights to sell, or who did <br /> <br />not want to sell, argued that the compensation offered by Los Angeles for <br /> <br />the water rights would not compensate the Valley for indirect damage <br /> <br />resulting from lost jobs and blighted businesses. But neither political <br /> <br />opposition nor dynamiting of aqueducts could stop the project. Los Angeles' <br /> <br />need for water, its political power, and its money were overwhelming. <br /> <br />Ultimately the City purchased most of the land, some 200,000 acres, as <br /> <br />well as the water rights in the Valley, and today has a hundred million <br /> <br />dollar investment in the Owen-Mono-Los Angeles aqueduct, about 35 million <br /> <br />-16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.