My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12332
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:39 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:31:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/14/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #16
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />from inundation and I soo no objootion to sdoptinc; such, my thought <br /> <br />baing that wo prooood upon tho fundamental idoa that the instru- <br /> <br />montality by whioh it is oonstruotod, tho souroo from whioh tho <br /> <br />monios aro drawn, should bo loft opon 80 th2,t ovory availablo 1'0- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />souroo bo marshallod from Vlhatovor (luartor to aooomplish that <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />groat work and, e.s 11 more incidont of that stupondous duty Con- <br /> <br />frontinG us, dovolol)mont of tho lower valloy'will follovl. I would <br /> <br />bo porfootly willinG to oommit myself to suoh a polioy. <br /> <br />UR. NOnVIEL" Porhaps that sort of oon~ni tmont from each of <br /> <br />tho states would tako care of tho: situo,tion" <br /> <br />!.lR. HOOV3R, I am vlOnclorinG whether wo oouldn't i:dvanoo a <br /> <br />littlo by tho sUGGostion; that tho southorn division should, under <br /> <br />a gonoral intorprotablo olauso assumo the obligation to provido <br /> <br />storaGo, and that thoroforo thoy would havo tho right to dosiGnato <br /> <br />whoro thoy would havo tho storago built, tho otho" stC\tos to <br /> <br />agroo to support such a designation by tho southarn stBtos~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1illb CARPENTEll~ From my ovm St~tols standpoint as a State, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />standinG alono, Vlhoro'lor it is built it will bo satisi\,otory to <br /> <br />us but hoYl far tho other statos I',ould 0,"1'0 to join in that opinion <br /> <br />would bo anothor quostion. <br /> <br />UR. CALD\'IELL: As for Utah, Utah would liko to soo tho best <br /> <br />struoturo and tho bost looation to accomplish tho purposo, Ylhorovor <br /> <br />that may boo <br /> <br />UR, CARl',mnn: I join in tha t , <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />iIR. CALD\'IELL: Porsonally thoro aro no projudioos on my rmrt <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />or on tho part of tho pooplo I roproscmt, so far as I know, <br /> <br />16th-S ,Jr, <br />10 <br /> <br />67 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.