Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />than that, it probe:bly wouldn't vary materially or e:ffoct tho <br /> <br />mean? <br /> <br />J.lR. ,\.. P. D_l VIS ; lJ 0 . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ilR. HOOVeR, So that you would got oomEmhoro around <br /> <br />17,000,000 foet as tho Loa's Forry flow? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />tin. ~. P. D~VIS; Yos, 17,000,000 would be a corroction in <br /> <br />tho right direction, probn bly not very far VJTong ~ <br /> <br />l.IR. HOOVlJR; I should think for mattors of discussion we <br /> <br />could take it that the reconstructed moan at Loo's Porry is a <br /> <br />minimum ef 16,400,000 and porho'ps, 17i th this ola-oorreto oalcu- <br /> <br />l:::~ tion, hG,lf 2. million abovo? i" 0 0 17 million" Thoroforo VlO <br /> <br />would CODO to 0 discucsion of c 50-50 bQsis on GODO figure lying <br /> <br />botwoon 16,400,000 and 17 million. <br /> <br />1ill" So Eo D!,"VIS~ \7ith (;1,11 duo rospect Lo those oninont <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />g0ntlomon~ I am still from LLissouri, I havo to bo GhOVrfl, but I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />am willing to ontcr into a discusGion on that lino" <br /> <br />ilR. HOOv,bR; I shoulo_ think tho result of' tho clcliborations <br /> <br />and of our Qdvicos on that matter ha.ve boon to oBtc~blish tho <br /> <br />16 million as " sort of loast moan. <br /> <br />I~o So B" D~"..VIS:: L.s tho 2..vorc1..go LlOE!..l1 at Loo' 3 Porry" <br /> <br />jEt. HOOVlJR; Yes, and that an a9Portionment of a minimum <br /> <br />would bo he:lf that sum, 8,200,000 acro foot i.notoad of tho <br /> <br />6,260,000 foot as sugGosted by Mr" Carpontor - so that this would <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />bo the Quostion on your proposal, dolivorinG ~pproximatoly 82 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />16th-S.P. <br />25 <br /> <br />82 <br /> <br />~ <br />