Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Dam. That doosn't includo tho Gila but does includo tho wator <br /> <br />tha t runs dm-m to tho Impcrie.l Valloy. <br /> <br />JdR. C1..RP:SNTER: 'Phon tho tablo you havo just mentionod is <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />not tho tablo or amount of wator that ran by Loo's Porry? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1ill. L. P. DAVIS: No. <br /> <br />l'IR" Cl.\.RPEITT:3R: But there should bo 2,c.dod to that amount <br /> <br />tho five hundred thousand extra for tho VCTY oxtrome lov! yoars? <br /> <br />1ill. '/"0 Po D..:'..VIS.: FivG hundrod thousand additional in <br /> <br />extrome lov yoars" <br /> <br />I.lR. 1I00nR; By mind is a littlo mixod. In tho first <br /> <br />place, on page 5 arc givon the gaugings at Laguna Dam ~ti1ich do <br /> <br />not includo tho Gila flow. Hr. Carpontor's calculation is based <br /> <br />on tho gauGinGs at Yuma, V1hich I understand include the Gila <br /> <br />and that is thc differonce between Hr. Carpontor's basis flnd <br /> <br />tho basis of the Laguna gaugings. Is that not truo? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I.m. CAHPBNTER, no, partly correct. I didn't dedu.ct tho <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />loss in tho rivor from Loo's Ferry te Laguna, <br /> <br />ER. HOOVilR: I VIa" saying the difforonce bet\'leon your eal- <br /> <br />culations and tho Laguna gaugings is simply tho flow of tho <br /> <br />Gila. ~10 LaGuna gauGings do inolude water which goos into tho <br /> <br />Imporial Valley. <br /> <br />11E" CLRF;::mfi'ER~ Yos, Sil'o <br /> <br />UR. Hooven,: So th2.t if VIe take tho 12gUll2. gauCine;s instead <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />of tho Yuma GauginGs wo liould oxcludo tho Gila flovi. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />1m. A. P. DAVIS,' \.'le YlOuld excludo the Gila flow, but YfO include <br /> <br />tho divorsion for tho Yuma projoct" Tho measurements at Yuma on <br /> <br />16th-S.F. <br />19 <br /> <br />76 <br />