My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12324
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12324
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:31:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.960
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations -- Lower Colorado Comprehensive Framework Study
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1971
Title
Lower Colorado Region Comprehensive Framework Study -- Appendix XV - Water Quality - Pollution Control and Health Factors
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The suggested wastewater treatment plan for metropolitan <br />Tucson is similar to that described for Phoenix. The tertiary <br />effluent would be discharged to a public aquatic park complex <br />and to ground water recharge. This additional treatment will <br />minimize the nitrates entering the ground water supply, a <br />problem that currently exists north of Tucson. <br /> <br />Streamflow Management <br /> <br />Water quality improvement by means of stream flow management <br />is limited in the Lower Colorado Region under present legal and <br />institutional environments. The maintenance of minimum flows <br />for water quality purposes is not recognized as a beneficial use <br />of water in the water rights laws of any state in the Region. <br />Availability of water in streams to maintain water quality <br />depends exclusively on flows released to meet other downstream <br />uses. Under existing laws, the entire flow of a stream could be <br />periodically removed leaving the stream dry regardless of water' <br />quality criteria. Therefore, management of streams to insure <br />minimum flows for water quality control is contingent upon <br />purchasing existing water rights or importation. <br /> <br />If water quality control becomes recognized as a legitimate <br />use, water resources management could provide for the optimum <br />combination of quality and quantity for the available supply. <br />In considering a streamflow management program, the effects of <br />stream regulation on an entire river basin would have to be an <br />integral part of any regionwide or basinwide water quality <br />man agement scheme. <br /> <br />Land Use ,and Management <br /> <br />Opportunities to improve water quality through careful land <br />management appear to be of the utmost significance. Land manage- <br />ment activities are known to contribute to water quality problems; <br />sediment and inorganic salts and minerals have a primary impact. <br />Animal wastes, agricultural chemicals, infectious agents, <br />turbidity, and heat are also of concern. Various aspects of the <br />effects of, land use are covered in this appendix but the net affect <br />of land management is not fully understood. Any of the land <br />management practices could possibly cause one or several changes <br />in the quality of water. Some of these activities have both <br />plus and minus effects on water quality. <br /> <br />Since a large percentage of the salt accretions contributing <br />to salinity are from diffuse natural sources and irrigation <br />return flows, potential salinity improvement benefits from <br />improved land management practices should be fully evaluated. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I! <br />il <br />II <br /> <br />" <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.