My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12318
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:31:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100
Description
CRSP
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/1/1980
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Review of Colorado River Storage Project and Related Individiual Participating Projexts, Water and Power Resources Service
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />,\-Iexico, Wyoming and Utah in accord with percentages established by the Act. The <br /> <br />apportioned revenues are to be used to repay the Federal investment costs of <br /> <br />participating projects located in each state. <br /> <br />In determining proposed power rates, the Service adopted a method of apportioning <br />storage project revenues which appears to deviate from the requirements of the <br />Act. Specifically, storage project revenues are applied towards repayment of <br />power investments applicable to participating projects located in Utah and <br />Wyoming (mostly Utah) without full consideration of the apportionment require- <br />ments set forth in the Act. The result is that Utah will receive more, and the <br />other states less, than their proper share of storage project revenues. If the <br />Service's method of apportionment is not in accord with the Act, storage project <br />power revenues will have to be increased by about $234- million. <br /> <br />Another issue disclosed by Our audit concerns contract terms for repayment of <br /> <br /> <br />irrigation costs. The President's water policy message of June 6, 1978, indicated a <br /> <br /> <br />need for improvements in the implementation of irrigation repayment and service <br /> <br /> <br />contracting procedures under existing Service authorities. In this regard, the Com- <br /> <br /> <br />missioner issued a memorandum dated December 29, 1973, instructing that (1) <br /> <br /> <br />contingency allowances should no longer be used in determining ability to pay and <br /> <br /> <br />(2) irrigation sales contracts should provide for recalculation and renegotiation of <br /> <br /> <br />ability to pay every 5 years. The memorandum indicated these procedures applied <br /> <br />only to water service contracts, and not to repayment contracts. We believe that <br /> <br /> <br />the policy should also apply to repayment contracts as well as water service <br /> <br /> <br />contracts issued by CRSP and its participating projects. The potential effect of <br /> <br />r.; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.