My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12310
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12310
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:30:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.110.J
Description
Juniper-Cross Mountain Project
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Date
7/21/1984
Title
Yampa River Reservoirs No. 1 and No. 2 - Water Yield Analysis
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. ~ <br /> . .. <br /> .. <br /> ("'1; 4. <br /> ..".. <br /> t- <br />. .... <br />. <br /> , <br /> ,. <br /> ~. <br /> 5. <br />. <br />. <br /> 6. <br /> <br />Reservoir ftflows were adjusted (rttuced) In accord with <br />anticipated future development in the Yampa Basin above the <br />two reservoirs. Potential depletions were established at <br />100,000 af annually. The anticipated consumptive use was <br />distri~uted over the year based upon a mix of potential <br />agricul'tural, municipal and industrial uses. <br /> <br />Available reservoir inflows were adjusted (reduced) to ~eet <br />the historic Maybell Canal demand on the Yampa River below <br />Juniper Reservoir..- <br /> <br />Minimum streamflow requirements were established below the <br />reservoirs. A minimum fishery bypass release of 200 cfs, or- <br />natural streamflow, whichever is less, was maintained below <br />both reservoirs at all times. If incoming flows were.less <br />than 200 cfs, the reservoirs were prohibited from storing <br />water. Releases 'were made from storage when necessary to <br />sustain the minimum flow. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />7. A minimum streamflow of ~.cfs August through April and <br />1,80~fs May through July was maintained on the Yampa below <br />~confluence with the Little Snake River. Xf flows were <br />less than these amounts, sufficient releases were mad~ from <br />. reservoir storage to provide the required flo\-Is. These <br />minimum flow levels are primarily for fishery and recreation <br />(boating) purposes. <br /> <br />.. . <br /> <br />8. The reservoir's annual y~eld was released to a hypothetical <br />- <br />downstream market on a sustained year-round basis. No <br />reductions were made for transit losses.to a delivery point. <br />Transit losses must be determ.ined on a case by case basis, <br />depending upon the ultim~te market location. <br /> <br />9. Water supplies allocated to satisfy compact requirements <br />included reservoir releases to meet the minimug streamflow <br />'. levels (outlined above) and reservoir spillage when their <br />total capacities were exceeded. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Studv Results <br /> <br />Scenario 1 - Compact Requirement - Must provide 1o,"'er basin <br />States an aggregate of 5 million af for any 10 consecutive <br />year period (av':!rage of 500,000 af/year). 0' <br /> <br />A safe yield of 360,000 af (sustained release of 497 cfs) of <br />"ater can be developed at the reservoir si tes while still <br />meeting Compact requirements. Water supplies available for <br />Compact requirements reached a 10'"' of 5,001,000 af for the <br />10 year period preceding 1968. Any water storage in excess <br />of 360,000 af ,",ould have violated the 5,000,000 af Compact <br />requirement during this time period. Annual Compact <br />deliveries reached a 10'"' of 1 ~9,663 af, in 1954 and a high of <br />1,076,492 af in 1971. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.