Laserfiche WebLink
<br />An additional 50 pounds per acre of N were appliad to the established <br />grasses in the spring of 1956. The plots have been irrigated at weekly <br />intervals. Yields of the replicated varieties (N-lto N-20) were taken <br />in 1955. <br /> <br />Tillage-Reclamation Plots (Large Field Plots) <br /> <br />The tUlage-reclamation plots were established in 1956. The general <br />design and plot treatuents are shown in Figure 2. The treatments are: <br /> <br />(l) 36-inch plowing with and without an application of 1 ton per <br />acre of gypSUlll in areas w.i.th a "pan" and without a "pan," <br /> <br />(2) 4 to 5-inch plowing with and without an application of 1 ten <br />per acre of gypsum in areas with a "pan" and without a "pan," and <br /> <br />(3) 36-inch chiselling with and without an application of 1 ton :Jer <br />al.lre of gypSUlll in areas with a "pan" and without a "pan." - <br /> <br />Each plot is 30 feet wide and 100 feet long. All plots were leached <br />with 28 acre-inches of water. A uniform application of 300 pounds per <br />acre of P2q~ fertilizer was made. The plots were seeded to Ranger alfalfa <br />in July 1956. The plots will be both surface and sub-irrigated. <br /> <br />YIELD RESULTS <br /> <br />Main Reclamation Plots (Plots 1 - 96) <br /> <br />The 1955 barley grain "yields are shown in Table I on page ll. The <br />greatest difference.s in yields were associated with the effects of the <br />water table levels. The average of the 1955 barley grain yields on the <br />subbed plots (l3.7 bU./A.) was approximately twice the yield on the <br />drained plots (7.9 bu./A.). Higher ;jtields were obtained from the addi- <br />tion of chemical amendments on the sub-irrigated plots. On the drained <br />plots little difference in yields was obtained from the addition of <br />amendments or rates of amendments. After 4 years of cropping little <br />difference in barley grain yields was l' ound between plots which had re- <br />ceived 2l acre-inches and 30 acre-inches of leaching water. No increase <br />in barley grain yields was obtained from the high rate of irrigation on <br />the drained plots. Barley yields were increased somewhat by the high <br />rate of surface irrigetion on the sub-irrigated plots. The law yield of <br />barley grain was due te severe bird damage and late frosts. <br /> <br />The yield results from the 1956 first cutting of alfalfa are shown <br />in Table II. The alfalfa yields are influenced markedly by the stand <br />obtained on the plots. Poor stands of alfalfa were obtained on the plots <br />which received the low rate of surface irrigation in both the drained <br />and sub-irrigated areas. Both the stand and yields of alfalfa are better, <br />generally, in the sub-irrigated area. Highest yields were obtained from <br />plots which received the higher rate of chemical amendments. In the sub- <br />irrigated area higher yields are also asscciated with plots which originally <br />had received 30 acre-inches of leaching water. <br /> <br />-9- <br /> <br />f"','-'"",,,, J <br />; . ' . -"I ~ <br />J '. ~'" ~..... <br /> <br />~. <br />