Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />not feasible or desirable. It has also been noted that the only <br />determinat ion which will be made when the study is completed is <br />whether any alternative project or projects look to be <br />sufficiently promising as to merit further study. Should it be <br />determined that further study is in order, then the above- <br />mentioned issues concerning the scope of study and the evaluation <br />of impacts will need to be addressed. <br /> <br />The staff has also tried to emphasize that no decision as to <br />whether to proceed with project development is imminent. Several <br />years and several millions of dollars of study would be required <br />before such a determination could be made. Environmental impact <br />statements and proceedings .before the Federal Energey Regulatory <br />Commission, to name only two, would be needed before any final <br />decis ions could be made. <br /> <br />Finally, with respect to comments on analytical procedures <br />and evaluation methodologies, it has been announced that written <br />comments concerning these aspects of the study will be timely if <br />received by August 30th. Another meeting of the Advisors has <br />also been scheduled for the sole pUrpose of discussing these <br />matters. The design of the second phase of the study will not be <br />decided upon until all pertinent comments have been reviewed and <br />taken into account as appropriate. <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />MCD:dm <br />