My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12286
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:29:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
8/1/1983
Author
USFS
Title
Summary of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Forest Plan - White River National Forest
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />000294 <br /> <br />leases in all wilderness. Wildlife habitat conditions would be similar to <br />today. Grazing would be maintained at current levels. Wood resource outputs <br />would be increased to meet current direction with emphasis on salvage of dead- <br />wood. Water yield would increase slightly as a result of vegetation manage- <br />ment. Mineral exploration would be facilitated by improved access over the <br />period. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE C - (1980 RPA PROGRAM) <br /> <br />Alternative C is based on the Regional goals described in the Rocky Mountain <br />Regional Guide and the White River National Forest portion of the Resources <br />Planning Act (RPA) 1980 Program targets assigned to the Forest. Developed <br />recreation capacity would double and downhill skiing would increase to 6.0 <br />MMRVD's. Required objectives for dispersed recreation would be met and trails <br />and trailheads would be expanded. A "lease" recommendation for oil and gas <br />leasing, with appropriate stipulations, would be made on some wilderness <br />lands. Wildlife habitat capacity would be increased and winter range would <br />be maintained at current levels. Livestock grazing would increase to meet <br />demand. Vegetation management would be directed toward increasing water yield <br />by producing wood resource outputs above expected demand. This alternative <br />would have the greatest water yield. Improved road access would encourage <br />mineral exploration and development. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE D - (MARKET OUTPUTS) <br /> <br />Alternative D emphasizes production of those goods and services such as devel- <br />oped recreation (including downhill skiing), range, and timber which have <br />the potential to produce income to the United States Treasury. Vegetation <br />management would be directed toward increasing water yield, expansion of ski <br />areas, improving range condition, and increasing timber production. Developed <br />recreation capacity would be increased with non-fee sites converted to fee <br />sites. Downhill skiing opportunities could be expanded to 7.7 MMRVD's, which <br />is the high end of the estimated demand range. Dispersed motorized recreation <br />opportunities would increase as a result of road construction, while non- <br />motorized opportunities will decrease. Total miles of trails maintained would <br />decrease. A "lease" recommendation for oil and gas leasing, with appropriate <br />stipulations, would be made on some wilderness lands. Wildlife habitat <br />capaci ty would be increased due to timber act ivi ties, although winter range <br />treatment would be less than current management. Livestock grazing would <br />increase. Timber outputs would be expanded to meet the maximum projected <br />needs of industry. Water yield would increase as a result of vegetation man- <br />agement. Mineral exploration would be encouraged with improved access. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE E - (NON-MARKET ALTERNATIVE) <br /> <br />Alternative E emphasizes the production of dispersed recreation, wildlife <br />habitat, particularly winter range, and other goods and services which do not <br />result in direct returns to the United States Treasury and for which a tradi- <br />tional buying and selling market does not exist. Vegetation management would <br />be primarily directed toward improving wildlife habitat. Developed recreation <br />site capacity would be maintained. Currently approved downhill ski sites <br />would be built, but no new sites would be approved. Potential capacity would <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.