Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE 2 (Continued) <br /> <br />Comparison of Planning Question by Alternative (Average Annual Output for Year 1995 Unless Noted Otherwise) <br /> <br /> Alternative <br /> A B C D E F <br /> Output or Effect Non- Reduced <br /> PQ Planning Question to be Measured Units Preferred No Action RPA Market Market Budget <br /> 4. HOW WILL THE FOREST'S COOPERATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND LEVELS OF <br /> LONG RANGE MANAGEMENT GOVERNMENT IS AN ON-GOING CONCERN ON THE FOREST. <br /> PLANNING BE DEVELOPED MECHANISMS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED IN SPECIFIC <br /> TO BEST COOPERATE AREAS TO PROVIDE FOR COOPERATION SUCH AS THE <br /> WITH COMMUNITY, PRI- JOINT REVIEW PROCESS USED FOR MINERAL DEVELOP- <br /> VATE INDUSTRY AND MENTS AND SKI AREA PROPOSALS. ALL INTERESTED <br /> OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, GOVERNMENT. ENTITIES WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY <br /> AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO REVIEW AND COMMENT ON THE FOREST PLAN. <br /> GOALS AND OBJECTIVES <br />".. <br />'" MRVD11 <br /> 5. HOW WILL THE A. Developed 1,500 1,345 1,653 1,653 1,345 440 <br /> FOREST BE MANAGED recreatlon <br /> IN RESPONSE TO THE sites <br /> IMPACTS OF INCREAS- sites MRVD 1 I <br /> ING RECREATION USE B. Dispersed 13,342 11,798 13,724 14,195 13,721 13,367 <br /> IN DEVELOPED AND recreaation <br /> UNDEVELOPED AREAS capacity MRVDl/ <br /> C. Downhill 4,400 4,500 4,000 4,950 3,850 3,850 <br /> skiing MRVDl/ <br /> D. Wilderness 1,094 1,113 1,119 1,113 1,142 1,142 <br /> <br />lithe recreation capacity figures above are reported in MRVD's so the numbers can be compared to use trend <br />projections used throughout this document. The actual capacity in Persons At One Time (PAOT's) used in <br />planning are displayed in Chapter III of the EIS. <br /> <br />