Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />(,J <br />en <br />CD <br />C'J <br />(:J the contact between HSU-2 and HSU-3. Fluid resistivity, downhole flowmeter, <br />r' . <br />--, and temperature logs of the Carroll Well indicate a water-quality change from <br />about 220-240 mg/L DS above 2080 feet, to about 400 mg/L DS below that depth, <br />Gamma and neutron logs of the Alamosa Geothermal Well indicate an abrupt <br />increase in clay content below about 2000 feet. This change is strongly <br />evident for the Alamosa area, but may be present only in areas in and near <br />rift-related faults, With the present data set on the deep confined aquifer, <br />we are not able to say with confidence whether this change between HSU-2 and <br />HSU-3 is present beneath most of the Valley, or only at specific locations, <br />, I I <br />'~' \i,' I I. <br />~ , <br />Temperature logging in the Alamosa Geothermal Well indicates upward <br />leakage of ground water within HSU-3 at depths greater than 4000 feet and <br />downward leakage in HSU-2 at a depth of 2000 - 2500 feet. This apparent <br />movement into the 2500 to 4000-foot stratum may imply that there is also <br />attendant lateral movement at the HSU-2/HSU-3 contact. These conclusions have <br />been reached by analysis of local temperature variations with depth, as <br />measured by the temperature logging of the Alamosa Geothermal Well. The <br />temperature log yielded accurate data with which to perform the analysis with <br />adequate precision. This is the only known deep well in the Valley to which <br />this method can be applied, so the leakage conditions at other locations in <br />the Valley remain unknown. <br /> <br />''--I '",- ),;(..;: \, <br /> <br />\,c <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Transmissivity of HSU-2 is estimated to be approximately 132,000 gpd/ft <br />in the Hooper area, based on testing of the Hooper Pool Well. This agrees well <br />with earl ier studies of the upper confined aquifer (Emery et al, 1973). In <br />the Alamosa area, testing of the Carroll Well yielded estimates of <br />transmissivity of HSU-2 ranging from 4500 to 13,900 gpd/ft, This range is <br />significantly lower than earlier studies have estimated (Emery et al, 1973), <br />and may be due to plugging of casin9 slots in the well. <br /> <br />Dissolved solids concentration is expected to be in the range of 400 mg/L <br />to greater than 10,000 mg/L in the Hooper and Alamosa areas. It is expected <br />that the rift-related fault zone in the Alamosa area would exhibit poorer <br />water quality in HSU-3 than in non-rifted areas, due to the presence of poor- <br />qu~lity thermal waters circulating upward from great depth. This conclusion <br /> <br />i i <br />