Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />\~-l(" <br />Outdoor Empire <br /> <br />fly BOB SAlLE <br /> <br />Sparks flies Off fhe Handle <br /> <br />A CONFLICT WITHIN the Colorado <br />Department of Natural Resources over' <br />planned federal water-development proj- <br />ects has prompted the head of one state <br />board to accuse the Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife of "deliberate deception" and <br />"extortion." <br />The deception-extortion charge was <br />made by Felix Sparks, director of the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board. <br />Sparks made the remark in a memo- <br />randwn to board members recently. The <br />memo discussed the planned Savery-Pot <br />Hook dam and irrigation development on <br />the Little Snake River drainage in north- , <br />western Colorado and southern Wyoming. <br />The $70 million develoumeJ1t is one of <br />several Bureau of Reclamation projects <br />on the Western Slope which Gov. Dick <br />Lamm and his administration are sup- <br />porting, on the premise that future <br />energy or industrial developers will get <br />the water if farmers and stockmen don't. <br />And while Sparks backs Lamm's think- <br />ing, the Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />doesn't. The division notes that Savery- <br />l Pot Hook will destroy the habitat now <br />supporting as much as 25 per cent of the <br />state's antelope, as well as habitat fOf <br />other important species such as sage <br />grouse and elk. <br />THE HASSLE BETWEEN Sparks' <br />water conservation board and the wildlife <br />division over this issue is somewhat <br />ironic, in that the board supports the <br />division on the division's efforts to secure <br />minimum stream. flows on several state <br />lJtreams. (See story about the crystal <br />River elsewhere in this section.) <br />In any event, Sparks has been fru.strat- <br />ed by opposition to Savery-Pot Hook from <br />the wildlife division and other environ- <br />mental concerns. That frustration led to <br />thishlastinhismemo: <br />"The thrust of the arguments against <br />the project were to the effect that <br />increased irrigation would substantially <br />reduce the big game land sage grouse <br />populations of Moffat County. This ar- <br />gwnent was effectively CQuntered by life- <br />time residents of the area who testified <br />that both big-game animals and sage <br />grouse tend to concentrate on irrigated <br />lands, <br />"'I1tis fact is known to every farmer <br />throughout Colorado and to the Division <br />of Wildlife, Nevertheless, the division con- <br />tinues to perpetuate a deliberate decep- <br />tion, apparently as a form of extortion to <br />increase its land holdings. <br />"The admitted purpose of this mooeu- <br />vering is to increase the killing of <br />animals and birds. The irony of the situa- <br />tion is that various' sO-called environ- <br />mentaJ organizations seem to enthusi- <br />Jlstically support the annual ritualized de. <br />struction of native wildlife. It is quite dif. <br />ficult to comprehend how the killing of <br />animals and birds enhances the natural <br />environment. " <br />WHEW! THERE ARE so many distor- <br />tions and misconceptions and so much <br />misinformation in this outburst that it is <br />har<! to know where to begin to comment. <br />But here are the facts: <br /> <br />-Some 16,000 acres of mostly feederal <br />and state land will be taken by Savery- <br />Pot Hook, and that's where the Wildlife <br />lives. With habit<1t at a premium <br />everywhere, much of the displaced wilcf.. <br />life won't survive. <br />-Accordingly. the Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife has asked to be given land as <br />mitfgatioD of the loss, with the land to be <br />paid for by the Bureau of Reclamation, <br />In other words, an inviolate place for <br />wildlife to live. This and other mitigative <br />requests are concurred in by the division, <br />the Colorado Wildlife Commission and the <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (Thus, the <br />controversy becomes a kind of in-house <br />squabble at both state and federal <br />levels.) <br />-Wildlife such as antelope and sage <br />grouse don't live on irrigated pastures <br />and plowed fields. They occasionally <br />"crncentrate no" these places to'feed, it <br />food is inaccessible Of unavailable else- <br />where. But their stanle diets and protec- <br />tive cover are found in wild terrain. By <br />the reasoning of Sparks and his supposed <br />supporting cast of "every farmer <br />throughout Colorado," the eastern plains <br />should be full of sage grouse, and the <br />best antelope habitat in the country wol:lld <br />be in the grain fields of Iowa. <br />-Of course, the wildlife division would <br />like to increase its land holdings. That', <br />the only way tG guarantee that the divis- <br />ion can protect wildlife: <br />-The annual harvest 01 small. pe:rcent~ ( <br />ages Gf wildlife populations by hunters can a <br />in no way be equated with wiping out <br />that wildlife throug-h habitat destruction. tl <br />Losses caused by hunters (whose money tl <br />is used to manage wildlife) are offset by t! <br />annual wildlife reproduction; without b <br />habitat, there can be no reproduction. '\Ii <br />-If Felix Sparks has spent almost 20 <br />years heading a state conservation board <br />and still doesn't "comprebend" the basics <br />of wildlife management, he isn't as sharp <br />as we thought he was. Maybe Governor <br />Lamm, himself a hunter, could give <br />Sparks some tips in thJs area. <br />SPARKS LATER conceded to this col- <br />umn that he can appreciate the fact that <br />the Division of Wildlife has a responsi- <br />bility which isn't the same as his own. <br />But he said he is "ff1.istrated" that a <br />project originally given "top priGrity" by <br />the state water authorities as far back as <br />1938 should now be hampered by "last- <br />minute" opposition from wildlife inter- <br />ests. <br />And he said that the Lamm administra- <br />tion is supporting the Western Slope agri- <br />cultural water projects in part because of <br />the old fear that Gne must "use it (the <br />water) or lose,it," <br />Also, be said, advisefs to. President- <br />elect Jimmy Carter have recommended <br />that the Carter administration virtually <br />"cut off" all federal ftmding to the seven <br />water projects now being planned as part <br />of the continuing Colorado River Storage <br />Project, including Savery-Pot Hook. I <br />"We're desperate to !t~t the contracts <br />let on these projects," said Sparks, '.so <br />the U.S. (government) can't back out." <br />