Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />15. Failure to apply for Fry-Ark Retw:tl Flow u1 a given year does not prevent applicalion <br />in future yeao. Failutt: to exercise a right of fim refusal ill a given year dOes DOt <br />prevent exercise in subsequent years. - <br /> <br />16. A plll'Cb:ia;er of Fry-Ark Return Flow shull bau transit losses and evapor1!tion 1=, <br />if any, associated with the Fry-Ark Retum Flows it purl:hascs as assigned by the <br />Division Engineer. <br /> <br />17. The sulunis3.ion of an applil;Ation for Fry-Ark Return Flows COllSlitutes the <br />Applicant's agreement that (a) it is subjed: 10 and will comply with all applicable <br />federal and sllUl: Jaws, including the Reclamation Refunn Act of 1982 and the <br />regulalions thereunder, the SECWCD's decreed. Allocation Principles, the <br />SECWCD's Water Allocation Policy, the SECWAE's Policy Concemillg Sale of Fry- <br />Ark Retwn Flows From Projl':C1. Water, relevant portions of1he SECWCD's Con1lact <br />with the United States, and the teons and conditions of the SECWAE's <br />accompanying letter; (b) it will hold harmless, inde.mn.i1Y aud defend the SECWCD <br />and SECWAE from any liability, expense or damages which the SECWCD and <br />SBCWAE, their dim;tozs, agents amI employees may suffer arising from any faUutt: <br />of the Appliamt to so comply. including any assessment of adnthU.stn.tive cost <br />agllinst the SECWCD or SECWAE pursuant to 43 C.F.R. 9 426.24 (199S); and (c) it <br />has no claims asainst the SECWCD or SJ;CW AIl for past provision of water. <br /> <br />SPECIAL PROVISIONS <br /> <br />1. The approved price for the right to use fly-Ark Rl:tu111 Flow is $8.00 pet" acre-foot, <br />except in the case of the FOIlIltain Y.dley AlIlhor:ity Return Flow, where there may be <br />an additional dUlIge, to be determined, to Fountain Valley Retum Flow USClS outside <br />the Authority. <br /> <br />2. Pursuant to the SECWCD'S Jauuary 1989 Stipuliltion with Colorndo Springs, Pueblo, <br />and the Arkansas Yalley Ditch A5sociation in Case Nos. 84CW56 and 88CW43 <br />(Watt;r Division No.2), Fry-Arl<. R~'tum Haws from agricultural irrigation use may <br />ba pmchased only for use dowl1strct.rn ficin the point (s) of accretion to the stream; <br />ami (absent a new coun cka=) only Ivr ~undwater use or oth& ooes furthering a <br />Congressionally mthorized pll.IpOse of the F'ryingpau-Ark:.ansas Projm which do DOt <br />require a re-divcrsion frOD! the surface :iJows of the Arkansllll River. The 1989 <br />Stipulation similarly n:strius the use oi' \lIJJnea$ured municipal Fry-Ark Return <br />Flows, absent a new court dCClee <br /> <br />3 _ Subj~t to the limitations l>f the 1989 $tipulatiol1 regarding upstream exchange, <br />purchasen of Fry-AIK Return. Flo\l."5 may store fry-Ark Retwn Flows in Project <br />reservoirs in space allotted for the>r Project Water. Fry-Ark Return Flows from tnrns. <br />mountain Project Wala shaJl not be subject to spill from Project reservoirs, and Fry- <br />Ark Return Flows from east slope l'rojecl Water shall be in the category of last to <br />spill from project reservoirs. <br /> <br />I:JECEIVEO <br />FEB 14 1996 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />':'JATER RESc:....::-;~::.. <br />SH'.TE. EJiG""-". <br />