Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OO~i 57(' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />WESTE <br />STATE <br />WATER~ <br /> <br /> <br />TIlE WEEKLY NEWSLETIER OF TIlE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201 f 942 East 7145 So. f Midvale, Utah 84047 1 (SOl) 561-5300 f FAX (SOl) 255-%42 <br /> <br />Chairman - Dave Kennedy; Executive Director - Craig Bell; Editor - Ricky S. Torrey; Typist - Carrie Curvin <br /> <br />WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />CalWomia <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />California's increasing water demand and shrinking <br />supplies have prompted key developments over the <br />past week. Water supplies in California, already <br />stretched to the limit in wet years, are again at historic <br />lows, after a brief respite in 1993. Douglas P. Wheeler, <br />State Resources Secretary, announced on June 15th <br />the reopening of the State water bank. Originally <br />established by Governor Pete Wilson during the 1 991 <br />drought, the water bank is being reactivated "in what <br />is likely to be the fourth driest year of the century," <br />Secretary Wheeler said. The Department of Water <br />Resources was given permanent statutory authority in <br />1 992 to operate the water bank when needed. <br /> <br />As of June 1st, storage in 155 major California <br />reservoirs was at 86% of historical average. Secretary <br />Wheeler said the state will buy up to 300,000 acro-feet <br />to meet the requests of fourteen water agencies. <br />David Kennedy, Department of Water Resources <br />(DWR) Director and Chairman of the Western States <br />Water Council, said the state may also buy water in <br />the fall to help maintain its wildlWe refuges. The state <br />will pay $50 an acre-foot and, after administrative and <br />transfer costs, sell the water to many districts for $70. <br />The projected costs are much lower than the $125 per <br />acre-foot the state paid in 1991. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In related developments this week, California state <br />officials and federal authorities signed an agreement <br />to work together to help solve California's water needs. <br />The agreement aims to ease perennial conflict among <br />competing interests in the state's water resources. <br />The pact, which was more than a year in the making, <br />has been hailed as a major turning point in state- <br /> <br />federal relations. In general terms, it pledges federal <br />participation in finding a lasting solution to the bay- <br />delta problems that will both restore declining fish <br />populations and improve water delivery for urban and <br />agricultural areas relying on delta exports. It provides <br />that details will be developed "as soon as practicable." <br /> <br />Stephen Hall, Executive Director of the Association <br />of California Water Agencies which represents most of <br />the state's water suppliers, commented thai he is <br />'delighted that they have reached agreement." <br />However, he noted, "these are not long-term partners <br />walking arm-in-arm. These are adversaries edging <br />close to one another on a huge issue." Environmental <br />Defense Fund spokesman Tom Graff echoed a <br />cautious approval of the agreement. "We have a long <br />way to go before knowing whether there will be any <br />meat on this agreement or whether it's an agreement <br />of form, not substance," Graff said. <br /> <br />Colorado River - Lower Basin <br /> <br />On June 8-9, Senator Bill Bradley (D-NJ) chaired <br />oversight hearings addressing water problems and <br />possible solutions in the Lower Colorado River Basin. <br />The hearing brought testimony from senators and <br />others and provided a wealth of information (WSW <br />#1046). Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) opened the <br />hearing. He noted, "The western states are <br />experiencing tremendous growth, straining our natural <br />resources, our traditional way of life and perhaps most <br />importantly, the literal lifeline of the west that is the <br />Colorado River....ln 1929, when the waters of the lower <br />Colorado were apportioned, no one could have <br />guessed that southern Nevada would become a major <br />metropolitan center....Since no one foresaw Nevada's <br />growth, we were given the smallest apportionment of <br />water....Unfortunately,today, Nevada's 4% share of the <br />