Laserfiche WebLink
<br />UlH:.l f' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />WESTE <br />STATE <br />WATE <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />April 22, t~:;;c.f"," <br />. ;' Issue No. _1 - j <br />(__-< ..a...->~__,_.>_~{ <br />Y' A ~: :i~_: I i <br />> RECElVE.fJ.' ;'.:. ~:~;~=T''- <br />.iJ94j\~ .~! F <br />~ 1, I <br />CW";B .l cled rl~Jle <br />L /' IT. <br /><.,'" nserves <br />'~!':r;;()'," ~ <br />~:.' (1 <br /> <br />THE WEEKLY NEWSLEITER OF THE WFSfERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201 /942 East 7145 So. / Midvale, Utah 84047/(801) 561-5300 / FAX (801) 255-9642 <br /> <br />Chairman - Dave Kennedy; Executive Director - Craig Bell; Editor - Norm Johnson; Typist - Carrie Curvin <br /> <br />ENERGYIWATER aUAUTY <br /> <br />Federal Energy Regulatory Commission/Clean Watec <br />Act <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Senator J. Bennett Johnston (D-LA), Chair of the <br />Senate Energy Committee, recently requested <br />comments on S. 1114, to reauthorize the Clean Water <br />Act (CWA), from FERC Chair Betsy Moler. The bill is <br />now under consideration by the Senate Environment <br />Committee. Senator Johnston asked for comments on <br />the bill's effect on FERC's role in licensing and <br />regulating hydropower projects. Ms. Moler responded <br />that the pending legislation includes provisions "which <br />would effectively transfer control over the uses of the <br />Nation's rivers from the federal government to <br />the...states. This marks a change which would directly <br />contravene the current statutory scheme whereby the <br />commission Iicenses...projects by comprehensively <br />balancing competing uses of water resources." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Moler pointed out four sections of the bill that <br />would increase "the ability of local governments to <br />impose restrictions upon hydropower projects," thus <br />"changing the nature of the commission's role in <br />the...licensing process." These sections deal w~h <br />water quality cr~eria and standards, non-point source <br />pollution control, water-shed planning, and state <br />certification under CWA Section 401. Moler concluded <br />that the first three sections could allow states to delay, <br />or prevent, project construction. Her proposed <br />solution is to amend them to exempt hydro-licensing <br />from their application. <br /> <br />S. 1114 Section 602 would clarify the scope of state <br />authority under CWA Section 401. States would certify <br />that federally licensed activ~ies comply w~h water <br />quality standards, including the protection and <br /> <br />maintenance of designated and existing uses which <br />are part of the standards. Ms. Moler sees the section <br />as "expanding the scope of state certification," giving <br />states authority to impose "a broad range of <br />cond~lons upon projects that have little to do w~h <br />water quality, such as cond~ions relating to fish, <br />wildlife, and recreation." She calls Section 602 "the <br />most fundamental change in the legislation" and <br />requests that, "to avoid duplicative regulation and the <br />dismantling of the balanced scheme of federal <br />regulation of hydropower Iicensing,...state certification <br />... [be) lim~ed to...water quality and...not include issues <br />related to fish, wildlife, and recreation...." <br /> <br />Thirteen organizations including WSWC, Western <br />Governors' Association, National Governors' <br />Association, Conference of Western Attorneys General, <br />Natural Resources Defense Council, National Wildlife <br />Federation, and National Audubon Society have sent <br />Senator Max Baucus (D-Ml) , Chair of the Senate <br />Environment Committee, a letter supporting Section <br />602. It concludes that the clarifying amendment would <br />assure that "responsible state water management <br />activ~ies are not disrupted by an arb~rarily narrow <br />interpretation of Section 401." <br /> <br />ENVlRONMENT!UTlGAT10N <br />Endangered Species ActJSaImon <br /> <br />A federal district judge in Oregon has ruled that a <br />1993 biological opinion issued by the National Marine <br />Fisheries Service on operation of the Columbia River <br />power system is arb~rary and capricious, Idaho <br />Depanment of Fish and Game v. National Marine <br />Fisheries Service, Civ. No. 92-973-MA (March 28, <br />1994). The 38-page decision reviews historical and <br />legal developments concerning salmon recovery in the <br />