Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />(;~" -6'-' <br />u(Jl~':, <br /> <br />February 25, 1994 <br /> <br />'r\YIR <br />sc <br />,.. <br />, ASC <br /> <br />STERN <br />~TES WATER ~ <br /> <br />E <br /> <br />THE WEEKLY NEWSLETfER OF THE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201/942 East 7145 So. / Midvale, Utah 84047 / (801) 561-5300 / FAX (801) 255-9642 <br /> <br />Editor - Norm Johnson <br />Typist - Carrie Curvin <br /> <br />ENVlRONMENTJWATER RESOURCES <br />Endangered Species ActJMissouri River <br /> <br />The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has announced <br />that completion of a draft Environmental Impact <br />Statement (DEIS) for the Missouri River master manual <br />review (covering Corps project and system operating <br />procedures) will be delayed until June 1. Meanwhile, <br />the Corps and U.S. Fish and Wildlile Service will begin <br />consultation on the impact of system operations on <br />three endangered species. While consultation is <br />required, it is normally conducted after a DEIS is <br />completed. Consultation was begun earlier because <br />of the direct impact th,n Endangered Species Act <br />requirements will have on Missouri River system <br />operations. Both the piping plover and least tern are <br />birds with similar habitat requirements, nesting on <br />mainstem sandbars, but the needs of the pallid <br />sturgeon, a fish, are quite different. Once complete, <br />the Fish and Wildlile Service will issue a draft <br />bic!ogical opinion and the Corps wi!! select a preferred <br />alternative for the DEIS. A 120-day public comment <br />period will follow, during which the Corps will hold <br />public hearings throughout the Missouri River Basin <br />and in the Lower Mississippi River Basin. <br /> <br />WATER QUAUTY <br /> <br />Clean Water Act (CWA) <br /> <br />Markup of S.1114, the CWA reauthorization, <br />continues in the Senate Environment and Public <br />Works Committee this week as members and staff <br />consider over 78 pages of amendments recommended <br />by Chairman Max Baucus (D-Ml). Senator Harry Reid <br />(D-NV) has proposed an amendment, recommended <br />by Baucus, dealing with water quality and the arid <br />West (defined as that region receiving less than 15 <br /> <br />Chairman - Dave Kennedy <br />Executive Director - Craig Bell <br /> <br />inches of rain annually). The Reid amendment would <br />establish a beneficial reuse goal stating, "It is the <br />policy of Congress to promote the environmentally <br />beneficial reuse of water, especially for states in the <br />arid and semi-arid regions of the United States, to the <br />fullest extent practicable, in a manner consistent with <br />state law and the goals and requirements of this Act.' <br />EP A is directed to promote the reuse of reclaimed <br />water and the development of appropriate water <br />quality criteria and water quality standards for <br />ephemeral and effluent-dependent streams, which <br />recognizes reclaimed water can support aquatic and <br />riparian habitat that would not otherwise exist. <br /> <br />Senator Reid would also establish an Arid West <br />Water Quality Research Project at EPA's environmental <br />monitoring laboratory in Las Vegas, Nevada An <br />advisory board composed of western state regulatory <br />agencies, the research community, water and <br />wastewater agencies, and environmental and industry <br />interests would develop data for water quality criteria <br />documents for species and environmsrns appropriate <br />for ephemeral and effluent-dependent streams. <br /> <br />EPA would also convene a similar working group <br />to recommend revisions to the methodology used to <br />develop water quality criteria as appropriate for <br />ephemeral and effluent-dependent streams. This <br />would include a prioritized list of water quality criteria <br />that need to be developed or revised and that can be <br />appropriately adapted by states to "reflect special <br />regional and site-specilic characteristics, especially <br />with respect to the arid West," States could designate <br />alternative uses based on existing criteria applicable <br />acute aquatic Iile criteria, or other criteria specifically <br />developed by the state, EPA would review and <br />approve revised state water quality standards for <br />ephemeral and effluent-dependent streams iI they <br />meet the requirements of the CWA. <br />