My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12249
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12249
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:28:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP - Riverine Fish Flow Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/2004
Author
CDOW
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations 2004
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />1986, This suggested that roundtail chub had adjusted to long term low base flows by <br />maintaining small body size, <br /> <br />The fact that native fish maintained a remnant population given habitat conditions <br />that occur during long-term low-base flows indicated this population could respond <br />positively if flow conditions improved, The Dolores River data suggested low flows would <br />be much less problematic on the Yampa River if nonnative fish were not present in the <br />system. Also, the situation on the Yampa River suggested that the native fish population of <br />the Dolores River was susceptible to replacement by nonnative species such as green sunfish <br />and small mouth bass, <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Five years of fish composition, density, biomass and size structure data were <br />summarized at Sevens and DulTy on the Yampa River. The first two years, 1998 and 1999, <br />were identified as baseline population data, since these years had normal Summer and Fall <br />t10w conditions. The years 2000 and 2001 were the first two years of reduced base flows on <br />the Yampa River. Very low flows occurred during 2002. Native fish density and biomass <br />were reduced at all sites in 2003 compared to baseline years. Small mouth bass and white <br />sucker composition were increased in 2003 at both sites compared to the baseline years, <br />Speckled dace, mottled sculpin and bluehead sucker were eliminated or much reduced. <br />Flannelmouth sucker were noticeably reduced in 2003 compared to the baseline years. <br /> <br />Three years of fish population data were presented for the Lily Park site on the <br />'{ampa River. This site was unique in that channel catfish was the second most common <br />species, Evidence was presented of a large migrating channel catfish population that <br />occupied this section of the Yampa River. Channel catfish recruitment was apparently <br />improved by the 2002 flow conditions, Density and biomass of blue head sucker was much <br />reduced in 2003 compared to 2000. There was a noticeable shift in size structure in 2003, <br />with a much reduced incidence of the adult flannelmouth sucker and bluehead sucker larger <br />than 35 cm compared to 2000, <br /> <br />Four years of composition, density, biomass and size-structure data were given on the <br />Colorado River, with the baseline data from 1999,2000 and 2001. Only subtle changes were <br />found in the native fish population in 2003, which indicated that one year of low flows was <br />not highly problematic for native fish in the IS-Mile Reach. <br /> <br />One year of composition, relative abundance and size data was given for three sites <br />on the Gunnison River. The Gunnison River had the highest relative base flow conditions of <br />the study rivers and also apparently had the largest population of the native bluehead sucker, <br />flannelmouth sucker and roundtail chub, Surveys by the Fish and Wildlife Service also <br />found higher catch rates of native species on the Gunnison River than in the Colorado River. <br />It was concluded that the Gunnison River likely had better habitat availability for these native <br />species than the larger Colorado and Yampa Rivers, It was also concluded that reduced peak <br />flows in the Gunnison River were not problematic for bluehead sucker, flannelmouth sucker <br />and roundtail chub, In spite of reduced peak flows Burdick (1995) found a small population <br />of Colorado pikeminnow had reproduced successfully in recent years. <br /> <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.