My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12249
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12249
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:28:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP - Riverine Fish Flow Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/2004
Author
CDOW
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations 2004
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />downstream during the 2003 runoff lfso, this would mask the impacts of poor habitat <br />conditions in the IS-Mile Reach in 2002, <br /> <br />The 2003 data did not suggest a fish community that had been stressed by a severe <br />environmental event. In fact. the fish community data in 2003 was very similar to prior <br />years, This indicates that one year of low flows did not have a significant negative impact on <br />native fish. The data did suggest that nonnative fish were more resistant to drought <br />conditions than native species, The species with the largest negative impact was bluehead <br />sucker, which is a deep-riffle habitat species (Anderson and Stewart 2003). Deep-riffle <br />habitat is lost at low flows making this species the most vulnerable to habitat loss during <br />drought conditions, Adult flannelmouth sucker and roundtail chub density and biomass <br />were stable in 2003, but a poor 2002 year-class indicated reduced reproductive success for <br />these two species compared to baseline years, <br /> <br />The species with the largest increase in the IS-Mile Reach in 2003 was carp followed <br />by channel catfish and white sucker. The carp population had been a significant part of the <br />community in the IS-Mile Reach for a long period. Adult carp habitat at flows near 1,000 <br />cfs appeared to be restricted to shoreline areas with cover and backwaters, Suitable habitat <br />for carp likely increased with lower flows since area of low velocity pools increase under <br />these conditions (Anderson and Stewart 2003). <br /> <br />Anderson and Stewart (2003) determined that backwater or nursery habitat <br />availability increases with decreasing flows. This appears to suggest that lower flows, as <br />observed in 2002, could be beneficial for recruitment of Age-O native fish. However, the <br />biological data found this had not happened in either the IS-Mile Reach or the Yampa River. <br />In the IS-Mile Reach habitat diversity was maximized at flows near 1,000 cfs (Anderson and <br />Stewart 2003), Also in 2000 and 2001, years with base flows near lOOO cfs, Age-O and Age- <br />l native fish were commonly collected. The fact that the adult population of native sucker <br />and roundtail chub appeared to be at carrying capacity further suggested recruitment of <br />juveniles had been sufficient in years with base flows over 800 cfs, These facts indicated <br />that reducing flows to increase backwater habitat for nursery areas for native species would <br />be counter-productive, <br /> <br />Small mouth bass made their first noticeable appearance in 2003, This coincided with <br />the first year of low flows for the IS-Mile Reach, <br /> <br />It was observed in 2003 that there were much fewer Age-O and Age-I white sucker <br />collected in backwater habitats compared to prior years. It was observed on the Yampa River <br />low flow years coincided with increased abundance of centrarchid predators. Increased <br />predation likely explained the reduced presence of Age-O and Age-l white sucker in 2003 in <br />the IS-Mile Reach, <br /> <br />An increase in channel catfish was observed in 2003 compared to earlier years, This <br />could be within the range of sampling variation, but it also suggested habitat was improved in <br />2002 compared to years with the normal 900 cfs plus flows. It was noted that at Lily Park <br />where there was a very large channel catfish population there were very few roundtail chub. <br /> <br />38 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.