My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12249
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12249
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:14:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:28:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP - Riverine Fish Flow Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/2004
Author
CDOW
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations 2004
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />White sucker and their hybrids were 36% of the catch in 2003 compared to about <br />15% of the catch in the four previous years, Small mouth bass were 13% in 2003 compared <br />to about 3% in prior years, In the baseline years (wet cycle) both channel catfish and <br />nonhem pike were more common than in the later three years (dry cycle). Black crappie <br />composition was highest in 2003, but still only 2%, Carp were consistent in all five years at <br />near 4% of the catch, <br /> <br />The Sevens' total density estimates (all fish combined) were very similar in 1998 <br />(I 79.'1Iha) and 1999 (179,11km) (Table 7), Total biomass at Sevens was also very similar <br />(162.2 kglha) in 1998 and (16S.4 kglha) 1999 (Table 8). The density and biomass estimates <br />for 1998 and 1999 represented the baseline carrying capacity at this site, The total biomass <br />estimate in 2000 (98.4 kglha) and 200 I (87,S kglha) were consistent to each other, but less <br />than the baseline years (1998 and 1999), The difference in density estimates from 1998 - <br />2001 were significant. They were alpha = O,OS both between years and simultaneously, The <br />reduced biomass in 2000 and 2001 likely indicated reduced carrying capacity since species <br />composition was consistent. In 2003 the biomass estimate was higher than 2000 and 2001 <br />(Table 8), but less than 1998 and 1999, An increase in total biomass in 2003 resulted from <br />an increase in white sucker. carp and small mouth bass (nonnative species), <br /> <br />In 2003 density and biomass estimates for all native species was the lowest of the <br />study period, In the first four years at Sevens, tlannelmouth sucker was the most common <br />fish (larger> IS cm) in the catch, but ranked third in 2003. Flannelmouth sucker biomass <br />was similar in 1998 & 1999 (l',aseline years), but lowered in each successive year. <br />Flannelmouth sucker biomass in 2003 was about SO% of the baseline years (Table 8). The <br />species with the greatest change in biomass was bluehead sucker. In 1998, 1999 and 2000 <br />bluehead sucker biomass was about 15 to 17 kglha, The bluehead biomass estimate was S <br />kglha in 2001 and only 0.6 kglha in 2003. Sample size was small for chub in all years and <br />recapture rates were not high enough to produce tight confidence intervals. Given roughly <br />equal sampling effon between years, however, it appeared that the biomass of round tail chub <br />also declined during the study period, but not as much as other native fish. <br /> <br />In contrast, the non native fish, -- white sucker, smallmouth bass and carp -- increased <br />in densities in 2003 compared to the baseline years (1998 and 1999), White sucker density <br />was nearly tripled in 2003 to the prior years, but its biomass was only slightly higher (Table <br />8) because small fish were more abundant. Yearling-sized white sucker were common in <br />2003 (Figure A 1-18). but not in prior years. Both density and biomass of small mouth bass <br />was much higher in 2003 compared to the prior years and the increase was roughly ten fold <br />for both categories. The higher number of Age-l carp accounted for the higher carp density <br />in 2003 (Table 7), <br /> <br />\9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.