Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ .11.'. <br />'i,"'i&. . <br /> <br />The step-trend results of multiple t-tests on chlo- <br />ride and sodium concentrations and on ranks of the data <br />(Wilcoxon rank-sum test) among the various periods <br />for each station are summarized in table 9. The t-tests <br />on concentrations (the T-group results in table 9) test <br /> <br />for differences in means between data sets; t-tests on <br /> <br />the ranks (the W-group results) test for differences in <br />medians between data sets. An alpha level of 0.01 was <br />selected as the significance level for the t-tests. At <br />the background station 09304200, chloride and sodium <br />have not changed, except for the anomalous fluctua- <br />tions after completion of well plugging in 1981, and <br />the TRANS period had significantly higher concentra- <br />tions than the other three periods. The cause of the <br />higher concentrations during the TRANS period at <br />C't'lt;n.n n01.M"J(V) ic nn....lpgr hilt fhp R.ru~ {10Sl"ih\ <br />. .. <br /> <br />reported that there might have been a short-term <br />change in the ground-water flow system after the well <br />plugging that caused discharge of some saline water <br />into the White River near station 09304200. At <br />stations 09304600 and 09304800, mean chloride and <br />sodium concentrations were almost equal for the PRE <br />and TRANS periods, and those periods had signifi- <br />cantly greater concentrations than the post-project peri- <br />ods (table 9). All step-trend results were the same <br />among stations and time periods when using the para- <br />metric or non parametric method. Based on step-trend <br />tests, significant decreases in chloride and sodium con- <br />centrations occurred in the While River after comple- <br />tion of the well plugging at Meeker Dome in 1981. <br />Mean chloride and sodium concentrations at <br />station 09304800 for the POST I and POST2 periods <br />were not statistically different (table 9). Also, the <br />chloride and sodium concentrations in the three <br />sets of samples collected in water year 1995 at <br />station 09304800 (fig. 12) were similar to concentra- <br />tions in the POST2 period, and the 1995 data collected <br />at station 09304600 were similar to the concentrations <br />from the POSTI period for that station. The chloride <br />and sodium data for the POSTI and POST2 periods <br />and the new data collected in 1995 indicate that the <br />well plugging at Meeker Dome has remained intact <br />because there is no indication that chloride and sodium <br />concentrations have increased in the White River since <br />April 1982. <br />The chloride and sodium data collected in water <br />year 1995 at the four gaging stations on the White <br />River (fig. 2) were used to calculate dissolved-solids, <br />chloride, and sodium loads for comparison of loading <br />along the White River. The gain in dissolved solids <br />between stations 09304200 and 09304600 primarily <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />would be from ground-water discharge from Meeker <br />Dome (natural discharge plus perhaps some small <br />leakage in the wells) and from Coal Creek. The <br />dissolved-solids loading into the White River between <br />stations 09304200 and 09304600 accounted for <br /> <br />about 24 percent of the dissolved-solids load, for <br />about 75 percent of the chloride load, and for about <br />38 percent of the sodium load at station 09304800 for <br />the three sets of samples. The chloride loading indi- <br />cates that some ground water continues to discharge <br />from the Meeker Dome area into the White River. <br /> <br />The step-trend results were based on chloride <br />and sodium concentrations, and t-tests were not done <br />on flow-adjusted concentrations. As in other drainage <br />basins in the Upper Colorado River Basin, stream <br />discharge was above normal in water years 1983 and <br />1984 in the White River Basin. The instantaneous <br />stream discharges measured when chloride and sodium <br />samples were collected indicated that the samples from <br />the POSTI and POST2 periods generally were col- <br />lected at higher stream discharges than the samples col- <br />lected during the PRE period. However, the chloride <br />and sodium data for stations 09304600 and 09304800 <br />indicale that ion concentrations were much lower in <br />the POSTI and POST2 periods compared to the <br />PRE period for samples collected at approximately <br />the same stream discharge. To more rigorously <br />confirm that observation, ESTREND was used to <br />determine flow-adjusted trends for chloride and <br />sodium data during the intensive data-collection period <br />(July I978-September 1984). The well plugging <br />would have had no measurable effect on streamflow in <br />the White River; therefore, the flow-adjustment proce- <br />dure was used to remove the variance in concentrations <br />caused by changes in streamflow. The mean chloride <br />and sodium concentrations of samples for each month <br />were used for the monotonic trend tests because of the <br />weekly sampling frequency. The flow-adjusted chlo- <br />ride and sodium trends for stations 09304600 and <br />09304800 are highly significant (p value less than 0.01) <br />and indicated decreasing concentrations (table] 0). <br />LOWESS smooth curves were examined for flow- <br />adjusted chloride and sodium concentrations, and the <br />curves (not shown) indicated that flow-adjusted <br />concentrations for stations 09304600 and 09304800 <br />decreased after 1982. Therefore, the trend tests on <br />flow-adjusted concentrations also confirm that signifi- <br />cant decreases in chloride and sodium concentrations <br />occurred in the White River downstream from Meeker <br />Dome after completion of well plugging in 1981. <br /> <br />34 Trend Anelysls of Selected Wetsr-Quallty Date A.socleted With Sellnlty-Controt Prolectstn the Grsnd Velley, <br />In the Lower Gunnison River Basin, and at Meeker Dome, Western Colorado <br />