Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.\,r . . <br /> <br />Priority Reaches for Investigating Water Rights Acquisition <br />in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin <br /> <br />by <br /> <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 <br />March I, 1988 <br /> <br />Three river reaches in the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) were prioritized <br />for the investigation of the expenditure of funds proposed under the Recovery <br />Program (FWS, 1987a) to acquire water rights to legally protect the instream <br />flow needs of the rare Colorado River fishes (i.e., the Colorado squawfish, <br />humpback chub, bony tail chub, and razorback sucker). The following reaches of <br />occupied endangered fish habitat were evaluated (Figure 1): <br /> <br />o Yampa River (RM 0 - 140) <br />o Colorado River (RM 170 - 185) <br />o White River (RM 0 - 156) <br /> <br />The Service believes that maintenance and protection of instream flows in all <br />of these reaches is important to the recovery of the rare Colorado River <br />fishes. Priorities are provided only to identify those river reaches where <br />the Recovery Implementation Committee should focus its time and resources to <br />ensure provision of instream flows for the four rare fish species through the <br />acquisition of water rights. <br /> <br />Each river reach was evaluated according to two criteria: <br /> <br />I. BioloGical SiGnificance of the Reach: This criteria focused on the <br />biological importance of the reach to the recovery of the Colorado <br />squawfish, humpback chub, razorback sucker and bony tail chub. <br /> <br />2. TiminG of Water Development: This criteria addressed the timing of <br />water development and other activities that may alter the quality or <br />quantity of available habitat in the above reaches. <br /> <br />The evaluation and prioritization of these reaches also was predicated on <br />several considerations or assumptions: <br /> <br />1. Adequate funds will be available to acquire water rights of <br />sufficient yield and priority to protect the instream flow needs of <br />the species/life stage of concern. <br /> <br />2. The instream flow needs of the endangered fishes in the mainstem <br />Green River below the confluence of the Yampa River and in the <br />mainstem Colorado River below the confluence of the Gunnison River <br />would be addressed initially through the Section 7 consultations on <br />Blue Mesa and Flaming Gorge reservoirs. <br /> <br />Consequently, the following reaches, which are vitally important to <br />the recovery and survival of the Colorado River endangered fishes, <br />were not evaluated in this initial prioritization: <br /> <br />I <br />