Laserfiche WebLink
<br />While in individual cases there may be some variances, the <br />basic principles are: <br /> <br />1. Costs allocated to irrigation (Ed. The costs of a <br />multi-purpose water project that are attributable to <br />irrigation, as opposed to other purposes such as flood <br />control, hydroelectric power generation, or navigation, <br />for example) are repaid (Ed. To the U.S. Treasury) <br />over a period of 50 years plus whatever development <br />period is prescribed (Ed. The 50-year plus <br />development time repayment period applies specifically <br />to the Colorado River Storage Project. For irrigation <br />projects that are part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River <br />Basin Program, the repayment period specified in the <br />R eclama tion Act of 1939 is 40 year s pi us a <br />development period not to exceed 10 years). . . . <br />Over the irrigation repayment period, the irrigation <br />water users, through their organizations which contract <br />with the Bureau (Ed. Bureau of Reclamation) for that <br />purpose, repay the portion of the irrigation costs <br />determined by the Bureau . . . to be wi thin their <br />repayment ability. The balance is repaid from <br />revenues from the sale of power from the project <br />involved, over and above the power costs themselves . <br /> <br />. . . <br /> <br />2. Costs allocated to power (Ed. The costs of a multi- <br />purpose water project attributable to hydroelectric <br />power generation) are repaid over a period of 50 years <br />or, in the case of facilities that have a life <br />expectancy of less than 50 years, over the period of <br />useful life. <br /> <br />3. In the case of costs allocated to power, interest is <br />charged on unamortized balances. Irrigation costs are <br />interest free (Ed. Only the capital costs of irrigation <br />projects are repaid over the repayment period. No <br />interest is charged on the unpaid balance). <br /> <br />In order to keep this explanation simple, I have <br />deliberately chosen not to describe either the cost <br />allocation process or the repayment requirements for <br />municipal water supply, which is also a reimbursable <br />function. Suffice it to say, that the principles <br />applicable to power are in general also applicable to <br />municipal water supply. Most projects also include <br />non-reimbursable functions (Ed. Functions assumed to <br />have such general benefit to the nation as a whole <br />that they are paid by all taxpayers) -- flood control, <br />navigation, fish and wildlife, or some combination of <br />them. To the extent that costs of reservoirs or other <br />multi-purpose facilities include such purposes, as well <br />as reimbursable purposes, the costs are divided among <br />all of the purposes. As a result, in the case of a <br /> <br />-2- <br />