Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />r,E-l. WJctVn,'L: Call it orythlne: you] ike bl't let us have the <br />water'l'1h.r;Uil we have oreated the riGht to it. <br /> <br />No ~nswer. <br /> <br />MR. CArlP.r;Wl'1rl: 'i'here is ono thought I have in mind - the d.e- <br />velopment of our segregated mountain up-state area, which is <br />limi ted b:,' transporta tion und other economic problems liside from <br />water power? <br /> <br />MR. UTLRICH: It is et :?reGent, ~nd will be for some years <br /> <br />to oome. <br /> <br />IAR. CARPENTER: Is it a fact that our development will be <br /> <br />~radual o~ Slow, as compared with lo~er States. or more rapid? <br />. MR. U!,LRICH: It will be morc /lrednal. <br />MR. CALDVvl';L:L: S,!,eaking of intra-stll tc pri ori ty. you had re- <br />ference to priority in'JWint of time? <br />MR. U:r-,LiUCI:i: Yes Sir, time of a'l'wo'lriati on. <br /> <br />MR. CP.LihdiLL: You r~co!l:nize that concomitant to pribority <br />there is benefic ial use, and thlit als 0 in the State the que stion <br />of publio welfs.re is 1.<1so tied to the doctrine of priori ty. <br />Now, in ti,o case of the Colorado rliver Basin, wculd public wel- <br />fare be best served, in your judgment, by granting w~ter rights <br />in the Lovler Basin, wi. th priori ty merely as to time, or by <br />diverting successively from the head down? <br />Mil. ULLHICH: vy diverting sucoessively frOm the head down. <br />In other words, by protecting the potential rights of the Ste.te. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />S.L. <br />