Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~m. HJJVLR: Cihould not there be sone understE,ndinc- between <br />the States before they start to irJfringe on the right8 of the <br />otrer StateS? <br /> <br />M:l. UJJ~,inCH; <br />M.:\. HOOVER; <br /> <br />AbsolutelJ', that should be determined beforehand'! <br />You would put sone maximum limit? <br /> <br />IvU. 1!'7RICH; <br /> <br />Yes. <br />c'ntil SllCh tiMe as you could see the picture <br /> <br />/lIB. HOOLl/: <br /> <br /> <br />clearly? <br /> <br /> <br />Mrl. U~;rdICH: Yes air. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. HOflVIEL; But you would not ask the lov'er basin to hesi- <br /> <br /> <br />tate about putting their lands in cultiv~tion until the rights <br /> <br /> <br />above have been satisfie~~ <br /> <br />Url. UI,JrlICl:; '~h&t de)ends on how far you can [;0. Youshould <br />not go beyond a pOint detrimental to the interests of the up- <br />stream States. <br />~lli. SCRUGH~J: ~he thing we are trying to get clear is whether <br />you advocate an unrestricted or a restricted use - I gather there <br />should be restriction in consumptive USe in each and every state, <br />MR. U:r,:r,RICH: There should be. <br />1IIR. llORVIl.'L; In whose h2nr1s should thE't be? (Question to <br />Mr. :Doremus.. I <br />1-liL lJQrlJ>lmS: I thinl: that sh ou1et be in thO hands of a cantral <br />!1llttority, and not in the hands of each individue1 State. I <br />think the GovernMe"t should say to us here in this StEte, "You <br />can let u:D & little. boys". 'l'l'ere shouH, be that ')o\"er that <br /> <br />S.L. <br />