Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. I,lR. DCii):;lJUS: Yns, vie on<;,ht to i'CYf,ot thrt we ::re in ~:nj; st"te <br />MR. :;J,;,J,:~SOH: ~'ifJ(1. the right to the use of the water ~houl<1 be <br />equal allover tho st~te -- allover tho b~sin? <br />MR. DOru-:,lUS: I clon't thinK that it \Iould. be equal. ;,ccording <br />to my theory it would depend upon the ordor of development. If <br />the lower river were to be ful.iy developed first, it would not <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />be an equitable way of ~oveloping tho river, and priorities so <br />aequirerl should, not provei!. I,:y iieE!. i3, that sUDorvised devel- <br />opment should be simultaneous along the entire river. <br />1!R. iiLam3011: 'l'here must be no prefoi'ences. <br /> <br />I,m. :::JO,hllUS: llo preferences. But equitable supervision in <br />the interest of all, and having in mind the greatest ultimate <br />good to the greatest number. <br />A1lR. CA~P);Wi'l;R: Sup1)ose the construction of the dam on the <br />lower river should be built upon the thoory of the whole approp- <br />riation of the entire flow of the river - would you still say the <br />lower construction sholl1d have the claim? <br />MR.OORLMUS: 'i'hat would not be eC}uitable and shaDId be pre- <br />vented. It would be a dotriment. lie Want to encourage every <br />indastry, but not one to the disadvant~8e of others and we w~nt <br />no monopoly. <br />MR. NORVltL: You think the law of appro?riation of water <br />should pre \fai 1 througho'"t the entire basin? <br /> <br />S.I. . <br />