Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RESTORATION OF REGULATED RIVERS <br /> <br />399 <br /> <br />;i::;~~;-' . <br /> <br />O~~ 3% <br /> <br />.,' .','~'. <br />," . <br />" <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />r. <br /> <br />foci for huinan activities within the catchment basin (Amoros e/ al., 1987; Petts et al., ] 989; Wissmar er ai" <br />1994) <br />Additional data are needed to confinn explicitly the pattern of biodiversity hypothesized in Figure 2 for a <br />spectrum of rivers world-wide, but the importance of alluvial zones as biological 'hot spots' within river con- <br />tinua is very clear (e,g, riparian plants: Junk e/ al., 1989; Gregory et aI., 1991; benthic insects: Zwick, 1992; <br />Roth et al., in press; fishes: WeJcomme, 1979; Rieman and McIntyre, 1995). Moreover, metapopulation the- <br />ory suggests that core populations are critical for persistence of metapopulations with core-satellite struc- <br />tures (Schoener 1991; Harrison 1991, 1994). Core populations are relatively large populations occupying <br />high quality habitat. In rivers, large alluvial reaches may support core populations of fishes (Lichatowich <br />and Mobrand, 1995), These productive populations can serve as stable sources of dispersers that can reco- <br />lonize peripheral habitats where less productive satellite populations have undergone local extinctions (Har- <br />rison, 1991, 1994; Reiman and McIntyre 1993; Li e/ aI., 1995; Schlosser and Angermeier, 1995); or, core <br />populations may 'rescue' from eKtinction satellite populations whose abundance has been severely reduced <br />(Brown and Kodrick-Brown, 1977; Gote1li 1991; Stacey and Taper, 1992), Thus, core populations can buffer <br />metapopulations against environmental change and contribute to resiliency of regional fish production, Cer- <br />tain riparian plant species also appear to exist as meta populations with cores on alluvial floodplains, <br />(Decamps and Tabacchi, 1994), Therefore, we propose that alluvial reaches should also be foci for large river <br />conservation and restoration. <br /> <br />;;g~~~:, <br /> <br />',: . .'.... <br /> <br />.: ", <br />"...."; . <br />. ..~ ,". .....:,,: <br />;,.......;.' <br />'-":"?;;'(r~;:.:... <br />: :.,.>f.~i.<:~:. <br />,"::: :: ~~ '. ..... <br />"'. .. -' .~ <br />.~.. :. <br /> <br />".' .::,' ~ -". <br />.....'... ..... <br />. ',...;. <br /> <br />": .' <br />':;.:,";:';.., <br />'.: <br /> <br />THE RIYER D1SCONTINUUM: HUMAN AL TERA nON OF LARGE RIVER ECOSYSTEMS <br /> <br />......... <br />~:..' '.:~~ ":>. <br /> <br />;t~\ji~J_ <br />~! <br /> <br />,; <br /> <br />Humans vastly reduce the capacity of river ecosystems to sustain natural biodiversity and bioproduction by <br />severing or compromising the dynamic interactive pathways of the river continuum, As described above, <br />native biota of rivers display life history traits that allow populations to survive within a certain range of <br />environmental variation that characterizes a particular river. ]f this range of variation changes, organisms <br />must locally adapt to the new range of environmental conditions or be extirpated, Recolonization of extir- <br />pated areas may occur over time as environmental constraints ameliorate and/or as a consequence of immi-. <br />gration of suitably adapted populations. However, human-mediated environmental change can be so rapid <br />and so severe as to exceed the ability of biota to adapt. The interactive pathways of the river continuum too <br />often are permanently severed by human activities, and native biodiversity and bioproduction decline. <br />Pervasive human perturbations that uncouple important ecological processes linking ecosystem compo- <br />nents in large river basins can be lumped into three broad classes: (a) water pollution of all types; (b) <br />food-web manipulation by harvest, stocking and exotic invasions; and (c) alteration of water, temperature <br />and materials flux by dams, diversions and revetment. Human land use creates direct and diffuse inputs of <br />water-borne wastes from the catchment and its airshed(Hynes, 1966; Warren, 1971), accelerates erosion and <br />sediment loading related to deforestation and road building (Waters, 1995), alters flux rates of materials in <br />rivers (e,g, eutrophication, acidification) and uncouples lotic food-webs by toxic effects. Harvest of fishes and <br />invertebrates, and the purposeful and accidental introduction of non-native species, induces strong interac- <br />tions that alter food-webs by causing biomass and bioproduction shifts, species replacements and other <br />trophic effects (Mooney, 1986) that may cascade through all trophic levels and even involve terrestrial spe- <br />cies that feed on aquatic biota (Spencer et aI., 1991), Pollution and food-web manipulation are inleractive <br />with stream regulation effects in most catchments, However, alteration of flow regimes and associated sever- <br />ing of connectivity in the three spatial dimensions of riverine ecosytems perhaps are the most strikingly per- <br />vasive influence of humans on river landscapes world-wide (Dynesius and Nilsson, 1994). <br /> <br />," '. ," <br />:/.:-.":'.,:;,,-' <br />;.\<\:..~..;::.:; <br />,";. <br />,;:...," <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />r;:.::~?:\\ <br />..;.....;::/..1 <br />,. .." <br />'.- <br /> <br />~~:'~;:.~.,:;X( <br /> <br />.i <br />" <br /> <br />~~?>:~t__ <br />: ,:~,;,":,:~ . <br />'\.,":-..:; ,", <br />:".,". ..';..... <br />~.\.::....: :'.:-,.: <br /> <br />~ftr~~;: <br /> <br />:::~\.';~:~ <br /> <br />::~ <br />., <br />;~ <br />.~.~ <br /> <br />~.; <br />.:.-l <br /> <br />.: <br /> <br />..! <br /> <br />.~:,:. <br /> <br />,-: <br /><: <br /> <br />Three first principles ~r the ecology of stream regulation <br />At least three fundamental commonalties emerge from the large literature on the ecology of regulated <br />rivers (reviewed by Baxter, 1977; Ward and Stanford, 1979, 1987; Lillehammer and Saltveit, 1984; Petts, <br />1989; Calow and Petts, 1992). These principles must be recognized in the derivation of large river restora- <br />tion strategies, <br />J, Habitat diversity is subs/antially reduced, Large storage dams world-wide inundate piedmont or <br /> <br />. -: . ." ~'. -:.,: <br /> <br />.' ~ .. , <br /> <br />;';'":=":1 <br /> <br />:.....:.) <br /> <br /> <br />-;; -; ~., <br />.',.'~.: <br /> <br />